Ricker.... This has been an issue for quite some time. Were it not, we would be on it, securing and painting over graffiti.
Unfortunately for what ever reason ( and I have no clue what it could be) The owner responds to nobody. Way back when they agreed to a hold harmless and even drafted one.. but no signature. So that is worthless, legally.
Mr. Milne , as you know at the meeting , permits us to be on his land. No problem. He cannot permit us to touch the building for any reason. It is no longer within his authority to do so. You recall at the meeting he asked was I still going down there.. My reply was no the hold harmless agreement between us expired when the building was let go. Absolutely true.
If I did not think I would get in trouble for doing so, I would be down there attempting to secure it. CM Jones, Lumb , the City's legal, even Mr Milne advised that we cannot do it. It is frustrating .
