For some reason this seems to be a problem across multiple authorities around here. Appointed boards that constantly heap high praise and lavish salaries and insist that everything is just fine until someone finally decides otherwise, at which point everything implodes.
^ The real problem with all appointed government institutional boards, including, not just agencies and authorities, but also universities and commissions, is that members are mostly appointed based on politics and donations to politicos making the appointments, not based on appointees' expertise, experience or passion relating to the mission of the institution. Patronage appointments are almost never good.
Whether JTA, JEA, JAA, the SJRWMD, UF, UNF, FSCJ, Planning Commission, state boards, city and state commissions, advisory boards, etc., it is rare to find a fully qualified group of board members acting in the best interest or with the best ability to serve the constituents or affected parties of said entity. It is one of our government's biggest weaknesses.
To add, why should a state-wide governor or legislature in Tallahassee be allowed to dispassionately appoint board members to local area boards that they have no real connection to or concern for vs. a mayor, local legislative body, local voters, etc.?