To me it all points towards new leadership is needed at JTA
If I remember right, Mayor Deegan won't get to appoint a new board member until ~2025, unless they resign prior.
But I don't see why the city has to tolerate this kind of behavior. JTA has the ability to build and operate transportation systems, that doesn't mean they have the exclusive right to or that we are obligated to pay them. There's no reason the city can't decide for itself what transportation it wants to spend its money on, especially if it's obvious that JTA has gotten completely out of control.
City Council can decide next Tuesday to go on the warpath and amend the gas tax to
not spend $250 million on turning the Skyway into a road for autonomous vehicles that don't exist in usable form yet after 7 years of "testing and learning". Two years ago I
suggested the language for doing just that. They can try (although I wouldn't necessarily expect it to succeed) to pay off the federal obligations for the existing Skyway or return the Bay Street grant funding (although if the funding went directly to JTA that might not work, but failing that strip JTA of any city share of that funding to demand they return it). They can direct, via their position on the TPO Board, to pull the U2C from the regional transportation plans and reposition other transit projects in its place. Maybe Nat Ford will threaten to resign over being stripped of his baby but I can't say I still see that as a problem.
A decade ago multiple states, famously including Florida, went ahead and blew up far more practical mass transit projects for purely political reasons, including outright handing back federal grant funds and canceling contracts and even disassembling construction equipment. New Jersey's ARC tunnel, Maryland's Red Line light rail, intercity rail projects in Ohio and Wisconsin and Florida, almost SunRail. The only thing preventing this city from doing similarly to the U2C is the lack of interest in doing so, especially with such little political cost to doing so. Can anyone really say that we'd suffer from political fallout for admitting that autonomous vehicles are not actually prepared to roll in less than two years? More importantly, are we obligated to spend hundreds of millions of dollars to protect the careers of Nat Ford and Bernard Schmidt and Angie Williams just because they convinced themselves that they'd figure it out?