If we want the urban core to shine, the DIA should require, in my humble opinion, architecture to be at a level that is unique, innovative, contextual, approachable, create interest, be aesthetically pleasing, lacks a sense of mass, constructed of higher grade and diverse materials and with sufficient greenery and setbacks to have some connection to the land and/or to provide some level of outdoor use.
When is the last time a local urban core building won a regional or national architecture award?
Much of the urban core is taking on the look of indistinct suburban developments. A Downtown should be the architectural jewel of a city, its show place. Architecture can be an economic development asset when properly deployed. People are attracted to unique and special landmarks. If we want Downtown to be special, so should its architecture.
Once again, Jacksonville seems to take on projects for the sake of doing them, not for incorporating them into a long term vision that is sustainable and has standards.