I'm not gonna get into the whole "Forrest name change" debate, but I will say this much; It seems like Southern named buildings, streets etc, that have controversial connotations for whatever reason (racial etc) are quickly denounced, while the Northern counterparts are completely let off the hook, and in some cases it would be blasphemous if anyone speaks out against.
Look at Tom Yawkey, who was a Boston Red Sox executive. He was known for being a racist by many (Jackie Robinson among others) and the Red Sox was the last team to have a black player. What do the ball club do? Name a street in his honor Yawkey Way, right by Fenway Park in one of the most liberal states today. No one says a peek. There are plenty of other examples too. So I'll try to get this through my head; Southern 'accused' racist = bad, Northern 'accused' racist = tolerable, okay...