As a contractor, I have looked at this building. The structural issue, the bulge, a couple of rotten 2x4's covered with stucco, is a days work. The vast majority of electrical issues are because the suspended ceiling was removed in parts of the second floor. MCCD's write up makes the building sound ten times worse that it is.
At issue, in my opinion, is that the MCCD inspector, is not qualified for the job he has taken on. He can not know what the structure is, he doesn't have the qualifications. He can not know what the value is, he isn't a commercial appraiser. Yet he writes it up as bad as he can to , I assume, cover his ass and perhaps because it's what the division chief requires of him. This does nothing to truly protect the public safety and certainly does nothing but make life harder for the owner of the building. It also prevents the sale of the building, by the way, because once condemned, it has no value.
This is just bad policy making on the part of the head of MCCD. Ms. Scott needs to review what is really going on here and start getting her people helping the city and it's property owners instead of trying to scare them into submission with yet another condemned and unusable building.