On a different note, my first question is actually this: What are the building's schematics in regard to setbacks, offering a more urbanesque versus suburban layout and design, and other such considerations? Or any of the other things that are championed on this site?
While Archiphreak makes a good point, are we cheering another piece of suburban/exurban commercial real estate, surrounded by parking lots and a half-mile away from the main thoroughfare?
The difference is the design of the building and it's layout on the site.
1. There is no setback between the building and the sidewalk along San Marco Blvd.
2. Parking will be available behind in the rear of the building.
3. Existing parallel parking spaces in front of the building will be retained.
4. Although the site is small, the building's large glass windows help expose what's happening on the inside, with the adjacent area (embraces the sidewalk and pass by traffic, as opposed to being a blank wall).
5. The design is also flexible. In the event that every single restaurant fails, this structure could easily be converted into an office building. This would not be so, if the common dining area happened to be outside.
If the average Jacksonville development incorporated most of these principles, Jacksonville would be a walkable city.