I'm really torn on this one, while also feeling like I don't have enough information to have a fully informed opinion on the best way to proceed. Clearly, Southeast isn't the right developer to bring this thing across the finish line. If Live Oak had the equity and ability to bring the project, as originally envisioned by Southeast, across the finish line in a way that was reasonable to Jacksonville taxpayers and that was guaranteed to break ground in 2025, I'd be all for it. Feels like it would be much quicker to hand off the existing project to a new owner better able to execute (like they are across the river at One Riverside) than it would be to start from scratch with yet another doomed city RFP or get bogged down in litigation for years. At the same time, if Live Oak is just going to be the new face of the same fruitless, one-sided development agreements that never go anywhere, maybe a reset is necessary. I assume gents like Mike & Bill probably have a better idea about whether Live Oak could get the Trio done quickly in a fair way with the city.