Thanks! I can shed a little light on this one now that it's through the DDRB. The use or inclusion of self storage in the building wasn't a concern as DDRB had no control over council's decision. I voted against final because I though it worse worse looking than the concept approved back in July. Primarily, the Home Street and Hendricks Avenue elevations. Home was a blank facade that was pretty bad at pedestrian level and Hendricks was Frankensteinish in appearance. My desire was that the same amount of focus applied to Prudential, be applied to Home and Hendricks. In my opinion, it didn't meet the design criteria we review by. Obviously, every member on the DDRB didn't think the same, hence the approval. Nevertheless, I have no hard feelings about the outcome. I actually wish the level this design team went through to make this project fit into the context, would have been taken with the LaVilla Daily's gas station last year.