^ Can you tell me what is so "great" or "fine" that appeals to you? The color scheme, the repetitious window and balcony rows with no detailing, the street presence facing Manifest, the courtyard view of the parking garage...
In fairness, I am relying on the article's pix and haven't seen it in person nor have I had the benefit of seeing any modifications since the pix were taken. If something new is going on, please share what that is and why it makes it better.
Maybe it is just the nature of apartment construction... build just enough to create the living spaces over and over again, by the hundreds, and don't worry about addressing the inherent boredom of the design that accompanies that. It's not any different for cookie cutter housing developments.
For a price, anyone can sell something and I don't doubt they will find takers. I have read that the apartment market is softening so it will be interesting to see how they price it and the response they get. If there is indeed a shortage vs. demand, they probably will get a good occupancy number. The real test will be if demand lags supply.
Good design doesn't have to cost more, it can just take a little more thought and creativity. If you see that here, please point it out since I am currently blind to it. For me, I just don't see where that effort was made and feel the City could have at least asked for that in return for its incentives, no matter the amount.
I guess it could be worse... take this in China
: