Author Topic: Businesses flee Regency Square Mall without AC  (Read 16095 times)

marcuscnelson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2335
  • Gen Z - Tired of the status quo
Re: Businesses flee Regency Square Mall without AC
« Reply #45 on: December 11, 2024, 11:06:39 AM »
I don't think sprawling by itself has anything to do with it. The land area of the city has little to do with its ability to plan, especially when so much of that land area is still rural open space, there is just a lack of desire by those in charge to do any planning. I stressed in this thread more than a year ago the need for and value in better planning redeveloping here. Even Downtown, with its wedding cake of stakeholders, people like lakelander have been beating this drum for years to relatively little effect. We can't even get Laura Street where it could easily be, much less Regency Square.

We can't rely on hoping that every developer will be Gateway Jax or else the project might as well be in St. Johns County.
« Last Edit: December 11, 2024, 11:25:26 AM by marcuscnelson »
So, to the young people fighting in this movement for change, here is my charge: march in the streets, protest, run for school committee or city council or the state legislature. And win. - Ed Markey

CityLife

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2220
Re: Businesses flee Regency Square Mall without AC
« Reply #46 on: December 11, 2024, 12:01:31 PM »
I don't think sprawling by itself has anything to do with it. The land area of the city has little to do with its ability to plan, especially when so much of that land area is still rural open space, there is just a lack of desire by those in charge to do any planning. I stressed in this thread more than a year ago the need for and value in better planning redeveloping here. Even Downtown, with its wedding cake of stakeholders, people like lakelander have been beating this drum for years to relatively little effect. We can't even get Laura Street where it could easily be, much less Regency Square.

We can't rely on hoping that every developer will be Gateway Jax or else the project might as well be in St. Johns County.

Jacksonville's government is effectively a county government, not a city government. For people that work in planning and development in Florida, it is well known that at the county level of planning, there is very little effort at creating special places. Hence why places like unincorporated Orange, Hillsborough, Broward, Palm Beach Counties and so on are just hodgepodges of sprawl. There is zero sense of place and limited desire/capability to change that. While Jax hasn't succeeded with it's Downtown development planning (which is a whole different story), it doesn't even try to do any real planning outside of Downtown.

Jacksonville has 19 City Council people all covering different districts over a massive land mass. The edge of Council District 12 (SW Side) is closer to the University of Florida than it is to the edge of District 2 (NE Side). The edge of District 11 (Nocatee) is closer to Castillo San Marcos than it is to Regency. The edge of District 14 (Oakleaf) is closer to Camp Blanding/Kingsley Lake than it is to Regency. You get the point.  Similarly, at the staff level, you have a Planning Department that is focused on managing growth in a massive sprawling area. They do not have the time or capability to focus on retrofitting existing areas, when they are stretched so thin.  With 19 Council people to answer to and so many different neighborhoods to cover, it's difficult to prioritize certain areas over others, so we're just left with a hodgepodge of crap, just like other unincorporated Counties around Florida.

I'm sure there are a lot of ways to resolve this issue, but one low hanging fruit that I've said in other threads before is to create Deputy Planning Directors in each of the 6 CPAC Districts and possibly even divide the junior staffers up to work under each of them. At the staff level, this would at least create a much stronger understanding of certain sides of town and have someone to hold accountable when the ball gets dropped.

Papa33

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 223
Re: Businesses flee Regency Square Mall without AC
« Reply #47 on: December 11, 2024, 02:18:04 PM »
Sporting Jax's wish to build its soccer "stadium" in the Regency Sears parking lot?  Dead?

copperfiend

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3602
Re: Businesses flee Regency Square Mall without AC
« Reply #48 on: December 11, 2024, 02:45:52 PM »
The soccer stadium idea was on the Sears side of the property, separate owner from this side of the mall.

thelakelander

  • The Jaxson
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 35292
    • Modern Cities
Re: Businesses flee Regency Square Mall without AC
« Reply #49 on: December 11, 2024, 04:18:55 PM »
I'm sure there are a lot of ways to resolve this issue, but one low hanging fruit that I've said in other threads before is to create Deputy Planning Directors in each of the 6 CPAC Districts and possibly even divide the junior staffers up to work under each of them. At the staff level, this would at least create a much stronger understanding of certain sides of town and have someone to hold accountable when the ball gets dropped.

I'm working with a few urban core neighborhoods. These places have gotten to the point, to where they are attempting to do their own visioning, planning and looking into zoning overlays to address their specific issues, challenges and opportunities. While it would be great if COJ overhauled its overall operation, our reality if places sit around and wait for that date, some of them won't be be around.
"A man who views the world the same at 50 as he did at 20 has wasted 30 years of his life.” - Muhammad Ali

Tacachale

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8382
Re: Businesses flee Regency Square Mall without AC
« Reply #50 on: December 11, 2024, 09:39:13 PM »
The administration is working through a couple of significant planning items right now, but the nearer-term bills focus on residential (especially affordability, missing middle housing, resiliency, etc) as that's the biggest issue right now. But regardless of how that goes it would be a while before we get to anything that would impact a project like this, so this kind of thing will continue to be up to the owners.
Do you believe that when the blue jay or another bird sings and the body is trembling, that is a signal that people are coming or something important is about to happen?

jaxlongtimer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3738
Re: Businesses flee Regency Square Mall without AC
« Reply #51 on: December 11, 2024, 10:36:30 PM »
On NPR's Fresh Air today, a Wharton professor discussed that the answer to more affordable housing is higher density buildings replacing lower density ones, mainly in urban-suburban areas.  He gave an example of a one story McDonalds replaced by a multi-story building with the McDonalds returning on the first floor.  He noted that Tokyo is a model for building "affordable" housing in a major city with its countless high rises.

Here is a link to the broadcast: 

Fresh Air: The U.S. is facing a severe housing shortage. Will Trump's proposals help?

https://www.npr.org/programs/fresh-air/


Here is a link to the transcript: 

https://www.npr.org/transcripts/nx-s1-5223561

Below is an interesting comment from the transcript.  Of course, Jax is focused on the go-nowhere U2C rather than using public transit to support greater density over the wider urban core and its suburbs.  And we wonder why developers are not pushing harder to build more density in or around downtown or anywhere else vs. the far-out suburbs.  Just defies common sense.
Quote
...Again, this isn't about building skyscrapers on every corner. It's about sensible densification, especially around transit, where we can reduce dependence on cars. And so this is relaxing single-family zoning and lot sizes, so allowing for things like duplexes or four-unit, very small multifamily developments. This is related to parking requirements and some of the other things that might be required in an apartment building that take up a lot of additional space where units would otherwise be useful.

So there's a number of things along those lines that I think, when combined with transit-oriented development - so developing near where public transit is available - can greatly relax some of these affordability constraints...