Author Topic: $135 Million redevelopment of Berkman II proposed  (Read 9408 times)

heights unknown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2092
  • HEIGHTS UNKNOWN (HOT DAMMIT!) YES...SUPER TALLS!!!
    • FRESH START SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY
Re: $135 Million redevelopment of Berkman II proposed
« Reply #15 on: June 17, 2021, 10:57:26 PM »
They, or someone, could have made something out of this building. Such a waste in my opinion; waste of money.
PLEASE FEEL FREE TO ACCESS MY PERSONAL FACEBOOK PAGE AT: https://www.facebook.com/garrybernardcoston.personal/ or, access my Social Service national/world wide page if you love supporting charities/social entities at: http://www.freshstartsocialagency.com; thank you!!!

Peter Griffin

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 352
Re: $135 Million redevelopment of Berkman II proposed
« Reply #16 on: June 18, 2021, 08:18:23 AM »
They, or someone, could have made something out of this building. Such a waste in my opinion; waste of money.
Short answer, no. Long answer, nope.

There was over a decade for somebody to do something

Nobody would ever sign off on a project that killed somebody during construction, then sat for over a decade in an extremely harsh environment, completely unmaintained and exposed to the elements. That building was barely a building, it was an eyesore, a liability, and a hazard. Goodbye.

vicupstate

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3620
Re: $135 Million redevelopment of Berkman II proposed
« Reply #17 on: June 18, 2021, 08:42:37 AM »
They, or someone, could have made something out of this building. Such a waste in my opinion; waste of money.
Short answer, no. Long answer, nope.

There was over a decade for somebody to do something

Nobody would ever sign off on a project that killed somebody during construction, then sat for over a decade in an extremely harsh environment, completely unmaintained and exposed to the elements. That building was barely a building, it was an eyesore, a liability, and a hazard. Goodbye.

Actually it was the adjoining GARAGE that killed somebody and it was demolished long ago. There was no reason this building had to sit for so many years. In just about any city the size of Jacksonville, it would have been salvaged. The market here was just too weak for that to happen.       
"The problem with quotes on the internet is you can never be certain they're authentic." - Abraham Lincoln

bl8jaxnative

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 867
Re: $135 Million redevelopment of Berkman II proposed
« Reply #18 on: June 18, 2021, 09:34:42 AM »
I just want that trash building to go away.   HOpe it happens soon.


There aren't many hi rises that get stuck uncompleted.   But when they do in that sort of state, completely exposed, I don't know of one that was later completed.

Ones that do, like the Fontainebleau Las Vegas, you have a combo of high demand plus the building was mostly done when the project stopped.  It was protected from the elements + such. 


Maybe it could.  IIRC Poland's got a skyscraper that sat exposed for 30 something years that was recently finished.  It'll be interesting to see how that holds up over time. 
« Last Edit: June 18, 2021, 09:46:11 AM by bl8jaxnative »

fieldafm

  • Editor
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4506
Re: $135 Million redevelopment of Berkman II proposed
« Reply #19 on: June 18, 2021, 01:50:16 PM »
They, or someone, could have made something out of this building. Such a waste in my opinion; waste of money.
Short answer, no. Long answer, nope.

There was over a decade for somebody to do something

Nobody would ever sign off on a project that killed somebody during construction, then sat for over a decade in an extremely harsh environment, completely unmaintained and exposed to the elements. That building was barely a building, it was an eyesore, a liability, and a hazard. Goodbye.

Actually it was the adjoining GARAGE that killed somebody and it was demolished long ago. There was no reason this building had to sit for so many years. In just about any city the size of Jacksonville, it would have been salvaged. The market here was just too weak for that to happen.     

While Berkman II has certainly been an eyesore for quite some time, the reason it sat undeveloped had everything to do with the ongoing series of lawsuits, countersuits, arbitration and foreclosure proceedings that followed the tragic collapse of the parking structure that claimed the life of William Edwards, and injured a few dozen more. 

In fact, the current owner(original general contractor) has been marred in legal proceedings since being awarded the building from those foreclosure proceedings.

There is nothing wrong with the structure of the tower that can't be fixed. It is now in danger of collapsing, nor is structurally unsound.  There are many engineering reports that back that up.

I think many people here are going to be disappointed when they begin to realize that the current demo won't be through a large implosion, that it will take many months to complete... and in fact won't be a complete demolition of the structure.  Unfortunately, the current lead partner of this newest redevelopment effort (Park Beeler) has a far, far worse track record than David Berkman (the original developer... who also once owned various minor league arena football and hockey teams in Jax).
« Last Edit: June 18, 2021, 01:54:20 PM by fieldafm »

bl8jaxnative

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 867
Re: $135 Million redevelopment of Berkman II proposed
« Reply #20 on: June 23, 2021, 10:11:15 AM »

There is nothing wrong with the structure of the tower that can't be fixed.

Everything can be fixed.  The question isn't can it be fixed but is it worth it.  I can fix up a 1982 Ford LTD and run it forever.   But it ain't worth the $$$$ compared to just buying a new car.