well, why?
Aside from his prediction that Colorado would end up outlawing marijuana, there was probably more to agree with than disagree with on much of his take on crime and corrections...which is what we talked about.
He seems to have an evolving perspective on corrections...much of it burgeoning from his pro-life stance.
simple...crime is only one small part of the public policy decisions a congressman works on. I have no disagreement with his creds with criminal justice issues (although I do disagree with some of his views), what other credentials does he have that make him worthy of being in Congress?
I don't really have an answer for what makes him worthy of Congress.
It didn't seem like he was framing his answers in this interview for a future run.
If I remember correctly, we lingered mostly around crime, prison, rehabilitation...etc. I did ask him about congress and he gave an ambiguous answer.
We talked about Brown. Rutherford is not a fan.