Regarding the Savannah deepening project, I quote the following from my report "Jaxport as Urban Growth Strategy: Community Implications and Prospects":
"The Corp has recently given preliminary approval for the Savannah project, but only up to 47 feet based on their cost-benefit calculations. In addition, as part of the review process, the Corp has conducted one of the only economic impact studies of the Savannah port. One of its conclusions is quite striking: “no additional cargo volume through Savannah Harbor as a result of the proposed harbor deepeningâ€.
The only additional Savannah employment estimated by the Corp are temporary jobs related to project construction. They do not estimate permanent jobs. But if the deepening does not increase the quantity of cargo, it is unclear how the project will increase the number of port-related jobs to any significant degree. Therefore, with a cost to taxpayers of $650 million, this dredging project would not appear to generate a sufficient labor market return on investment.
Instead, according to the report, the primary benefits will accrue to shipping companies, retailers, and foreign manufacturers who will save $174 million in transportation costs annually. This is due to the ability of larger ships to move the cargo with fewer trips. Thus, the primary beneficiaries of this project are non-local businesses. The secondary impact of this cost savings is lower costs to consumers nationwide assuming the cost savings are passed on in lower prices."
For the full report go to:
http://www.unf.edu/uploadedFiles/aa/coas/cci/ports/Jaxport%20As%20An%20Urban%20Growth%20Strategy%20-%20CCI.pdfat the University of North Florida Ports Project.
http://www.unf.edu/coas/cci/ports/