Councilman Clark Wants Mobility Fee Moratorium

February 8, 2013 165 comments Open printer friendly version of this article Print Article

Improving national economic conditions have resulted in Home Depot recently issuing a press release that the company will be hiring 80,000 more workers. In addition, Jacksonville is one of the nation's leaders in market rate multifamily construction, infill continues in Riverside and more development pops up around St. Johns Town Center and River City Marketplace every day. However, these market rate economic positives aren't enough for some. Despite community opposition, Councilman Richard Clark has filed a bill in favor of the City of Jacksonville implementing a three year tax increase in the form of a mobility fee moratorium. Here is a brief look at the details of Clark's proposed subsidy to development at the expense of the average taxpayer and how it could negatively impact our city's future.


A tunnel visioned approach to subsidized job creation in a single industry in city with an economy as diverse as Jacksonville is destined to failure.  For proof, look no further than Council's attempt to manipulate the market with last year's mobility fee moratorium. Statistical data resulting from that experiment proved that it was an epic failure.



Area building permits over the last year indicated that there was no rational nexus between the mobility fee moratorium and market realities.  While Duval, Clay, and Nassau Counties had suspended their fees, St. Johns County, continued to pull ahead, despite maintaining a concurrency fee system for new development to help financially support its negatives on existing public infrastructure.  Further leading to the growing gulf in quality-of-life between it and Duval, St. Johns has used the income generated to help invest in it's public education system.

At the statewide level, economic indicators also suggested that there was no remote correlation between last year's failed mobility fee moratorium, as the graph below visually displays.  If a one year experiment was a failure, why on earth would we want to play around with a three year attempt when the market is actually improving?





Councilman Clark's Ordinance 2013-94









What it means for Jacksonville


A new home on an infill site, such as this residence in Durkeeville, would not pay a mobility fee.  The mobility fee isn't against new development.  It is intended to guide new development to be fiscally responsible to the surrounding community.

Jacksonville is currently known as one of the most deadly cities in the country for pedestrians and bicyclist.  It is also a city with a struggling downtown and several older neighborhoods that have been negatively impacted by our subsidization of low quality growth over the last fifty years.  However, we are a community that possesses a ton of potential.  The mobility plan and fee were created to drive and stimulate the type of growth that results in a higher quality of life for our residents, while also generating the income necessary to invest in ourselves in a fiscally responsible manner.  

A mobility fee moratorium as a strategy for stimulating quality economic development and job creation is just as effective as attempting to nail jello to a wall.  In fact, it's a policy that can easily be considered as counterproductive to data and conversation flowing out of the recent JAX 2025 surveys and community visioning efforts.  If we're going to ask taxpayers to subsidize something, that conversation should be centered on issues such as better transit, public schools, libraries, neighborhoods, and port infrastructure.  It should not be about subsidizing market rate development at the expense of the taxpayers who's homes and businesses may already be underwater.


How You Can Get Involved


5000 Town, an example of market rate development already under construction without the need of a mobility fee moratorium.

The failure of Councilman Clark's pending legislation will place Jacksonville in a position to create additional jobs by investing in itself while also making the streets and mobility options, reliable and safe for all.  In addition, avoiding this subsidy will eliminate the hidden long term tax burden this moratorium will place on the backs of average everyday residents just trying to survive.

With this in mind, the City of Jacksonville's future needs its concerned resident's will power more than ever.  Councilman Clark's moratorium bill will be introduced to City Council on Tuesday, February 12, 2012.  Attendance at the February 12th meeting will be important to speak for the sunset of the moratorium and letters of support from residents and organizations showing how the mobility plan will help them are also important.  

Spreading information of the negative impacts of this bill to neighborhoods and contacting council representatives to encourage the defeat of this pending legislation is encouraged.  Such grassroots efforts can be a powerful tool for the average resident who simply desires to live in a community with a higher quality-of-life.


•             Mayor Alvin Brown's Office  630-1776         mayorbrown@coj.net

•             District 1 Clay Yarborough  630-1389         Clay@coj.net

•             District 2  William Bishop  630-1392          WBishop@coj.net

•             District 3 Richard Clark  630-1386         RClark@coj.net

•             District 10 Don Redman  630-1394       Redman@coj.net

•             District 5  Lori N. Boyer  630-1382          LBoyer@coj.net
 
•             District 6  Matt Schellenberg  630-1388     MattS@coj.net

•             District 7 Dr. Johnny Gaffney  630-1384    Gaffney@coj.net

•             District 8 E. Denise Lee  630-1385          EDLee@coj.net

•             District 9 Warren Jones  630-1395         WAJones@coj.net

•             District 10 Reggie Brown  630-1684       RBrown@coj.net

•             District 11 Ray Holt  630-1383              Holt@coj.net

•             District 12 Doyle Carter  630-1380         doylec@coj.net

•             District 13 Bill Guilliford  630-1397          Gulliford@coj.net

•             District 14 Jim Love  630-1390       JimLove@coj.net

•             At Large 1 Kimberly Daniels  630-1393    KimDaniels@coj.net

•             At Large 2 John R. Crescimbeni  630-1381         JRC@coj.net

•             At Large 3 Stephen Joost  630-1396         Joost@coj.net

•             At Large 4 Greg Anderson  630-1398    GAnderson@coj.net

•             At Large 5 Robin Lumb  630-1387    RLumb@coj.net


Editorial by Ennis Davis. Contact Ennis at edavis@moderncities.com


 PREV 1 2