seems like a waste of money to crack up a bunch of concrete on riverfront property just to replace it with grass Doesn't real make the fountain any more interesting or useful. Apparently if there's grass, its a play area, where concrete in the same space is just dead space. If there's nothing engaging to do in either - what's the point of the space?
If ALL they intend to do long term, is replace the concrete with landscape, that would be an improvement, but a disappointment. I agree that there needs to be more there to engage with, but all the concrete gives a cold, sterile appearance that is less inviting than what is envisioned.
It is a step in the right direction, but that's all.
That entire space between the bridges needs to be much higher and better utilized. I also think a Northbank location might be better for MOSH. Maybe it could be part of the Hogan's Creek project.
The current MOSH location is some of the primest land in the entire city, it is a total waste to have a low-rise, little used, non-taxpaying project there. Atlanta has a Children's Museum on the ground level of a condo tower. Something on that order should be in place of the MOSH-only parcel, if having MOSH on the Southbank is not negotiable.
The money intended for Metro Park should be spent on the Southbank area instead. Metro park is too isolated and distant from the urban core. That is a project for 10-15 years ahead when a Shipyards-type project is reality, not a dream.
I envision having a totally awesome Southbank (ie between the bridges) area with river taxis to a re-invented Landing, complete with an opening to the Laura St corridor. Laura Street could become be a retail corridor that intersects the Bay Street entertainment strip, and leads back to Hemming Plaza. This Southbank to Hemming 'strip' could be the crown jewel of the entire city if done right.