|
FayeforCure
|
 |
« on: November 01, 2009, 10:16:09 AM » |
|
Oct 27, 2009 Poll: Weigh in on high-speed rail in Florida Do you support high-speed rail linking Orlando and Tampa?Yes. Now that Disney is on board, maybe we'll finally get somewhere. (509 responses) 62.6% No. We need to put our transportation money into fixing our local commuting problems first. (193 responses) 23.7% Maybe. If it's easy to get from the stations to where I need to go -- and if tickets are cheap -- I'm for it. (111 responses) 13.7% 813 total responses (Results not scientific) http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/volusia/orl-high-speed-rail-poll,0,2458703,post.poll
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Harry S. Truman: "I never give them hell. I just tell the truth and they think it's hell." Anna Quindlen ~ If you're confused about the public option, just ask yourself this question: would you like to be eligible for Medicare at 40 rather than 65?
|
|
|
|
CS Foltz
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: November 01, 2009, 10:42:38 AM » |
|
Faye I am for HSR, even if it only starts from Orlando to Tampa, but it needs to be definitive with a clear plan for expansion to other parts of the state with a timetable and funding from the State end! I have no problem with a Federal financial partner but think that private enterprise would have a better operational plan! It goes without saying that the ticketing needs to be user friendly for not only local useage but non-locals also. Biggest problem that I see is, I still question starting true HSR in that part of the world since there really is no room for reasonable expansion. I still feel that Jacksonville to Miami would be a better test of a real life situation!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
buckethead
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: November 01, 2009, 11:51:54 AM » |
|
That poll would be more useful if it were in print.
My Carpet can always use more protection from the kitty's poopie paws.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
“Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber.” — Plato
|
|
|
|
thelakelander
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: November 01, 2009, 12:35:01 PM » |
|
I'm in favor of HSR. Just not the crazy plan Florida currently has on the table. If explained in further detail and presented with viable and more affordable alternative options, I'm sure a good amount of the 63% would feel the exact same way.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
mtraininjax
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: November 01, 2009, 12:37:13 PM » |
|
If the plan creates thousands of jobs for floridians, I am in favor of it. I could care less if the state or feds built widgets, we need to get people back to work, and now.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
And, that $115 will save Jacksonville from financial ruin. - Mayor John Peyton
|
|
|
|
thelakelander
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: November 01, 2009, 12:45:23 PM » |
|
Then you should be in favor of extending the skyway, building commuter rail and streetcars all across Jax. After all, it creates jobs.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
mtraininjax
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: November 01, 2009, 12:49:35 PM » |
|
Lake - Get 'er done.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
And, that $115 will save Jacksonville from financial ruin. - Mayor John Peyton
|
|
|
Ocklawaha
Phd. Ferroequinology
Global Moderator
Hero Member
    
Posts: 4048
Lightning Slinging Monster of Mobility!
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: November 01, 2009, 01:06:41 PM » |
|
We are back to square one Lake, FAYE doesn't know the difference in poll numbers or votes for a pet project, and facts stated by the industry. I'm not talking about facts from Doc, or Sentinels, or Mayors, I'm talking about pundits within railroading who support HSR, but not the current FL plan.
OCKLAWAHA
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
FayeforCure
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: November 01, 2009, 04:58:26 PM » |
|
pundits within railroading who support HSR, but not the current FL plan.
Pundits need to realize the funding that's available, and the current economic situation Florida finds itself in with its 11.5% unemployment. For sure, we can always find a better route, as we all agree the Orlando-Miami route would be, but we are limited to the available funding and the shovel ready nature of projects that qualify under the High Speed Rail Program. To fantasize about the perfect and let the good go to waste is futile. As the fourth largest state in the nation Florida would be foolish to pass up federal funding that doesn't require matching state funds!!! Plain and Simple. And all we need to do is show the federal government that we are willing to put up a dedicated funding source for the operational expenses associated with our successful Tri-Rail Commuter Rail, the ONLY existing commute rail system in Florida. The tiny Skyway is no comparison.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: November 01, 2009, 05:12:31 PM by FayeforCure »
|
Logged
|
Harry S. Truman: "I never give them hell. I just tell the truth and they think it's hell." Anna Quindlen ~ If you're confused about the public option, just ask yourself this question: would you like to be eligible for Medicare at 40 rather than 65?
|
|
|
Ocklawaha
Phd. Ferroequinology
Global Moderator
Hero Member
    
Posts: 4048
Lightning Slinging Monster of Mobility!
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: November 01, 2009, 05:28:53 PM » |
|
Faye, "The Tiny Skyway, The Titanic, The Britannic, The Olympic, The Aqua-Car, Hydrogen Zeppelins, The Cincinnati Subway, The Rochester Subway, The Freeway, NONE of which are anything like our Florida High Speed Rail Project, ours is worse, and about to be added to the infamous list if we dupe President Obama, into buying a second rate plan, for a third rate HSR railroad, from a State that DOESN'T rate in rail transportation. "Yes we can," does not mean "...be stupid!" It's not cool aid Florida, it's Titanic! "Drink TITANIC Beer, Goes Down Fast, Stays Ice Cold!"OCKLAWAHA
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
FayeforCure
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: November 01, 2009, 06:07:21 PM » |
|
Ock,.........just your typical hyperbole from you. Blowing things completely out of proportion.
There never was a successful titanic, but there are plenty of successful HSR lines around the world.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Harry S. Truman: "I never give them hell. I just tell the truth and they think it's hell." Anna Quindlen ~ If you're confused about the public option, just ask yourself this question: would you like to be eligible for Medicare at 40 rather than 65?
|
|
|
stephendare
libra
Metro Jacksonville
Hero Member
    
Posts: 12710
truth beauty art and love
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: November 01, 2009, 06:10:15 PM » |
|
Thats because they travelled at High Speed.
What does that have to do with the Orlando Tampa line?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"People are like stained glass windows they sparkle and shine when the sun is out, but when the darkness sets in their true beauty is revealed only if there is a light within." »Elizabeth Kubler-Ross
|
|
|
Ocklawaha
Phd. Ferroequinology
Global Moderator
Hero Member
    
Posts: 4048
Lightning Slinging Monster of Mobility!
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: November 01, 2009, 07:49:11 PM » |
|
http://www.metacafe.com/fplayer/2114885/spectacular_100mph_train_crash_test.swfOck,.........just your typical hyperbole from you. Blowing things completely out of proportion.
There never was a successful titanic, but there are plenty of successful HSR lines around the world.
It's the subject as a whole Faye, great failed, transportation projects of all time, and the fact that no matter the background of the people posting here, you keep parroting the lines of the State. That you won't try and understand, even though God knows Stephendare, Lakelander and I, have tried to help you fine tune your arguments, you don't hear us.
Your the one that brought the Skyway into this thread, and somewhere deep in the subconscious mind, Skyway - HSR and FAILURE, would seem to be linked. Remember me saying the Devil is in the details, when you complained that my posts are too detailed? Here is an example of a typical bushwhacker attack: OCKLARANT: The Titanic, was a fantastic vessel for her era, but had several design flaws. She shipped water over the bridge when in high seas, so the other two "sisters" were modified. Her watertight integrity and life boat count was far ahead of her time, yet still too "wrong" to save her. The ONLY cure for the disaster would have been to REROUTE THE SHIP BASED ON THE WARNINGS SENT OUT AND RECIEVED!
Giantic, after Titanics loss this name was canceled.
Those other two failures? Britannic, was never finished and not unlike the Skyway, she went down in WWI, doing a job she wasn't built to do. No one knows what caused the explosion that sank her in 400 feet of water off of Greece.
Olympic, was the only one of the 3 sisters of the Olympic Class of ships that lived out a full life. Even so she was flawed from the start as well. Cunard had developed the Steam Turbine which was far more fuel efficient, but White Star, was unmoved. She served on mostly trans Atlantic cruises until 1935, when she was laid up and scraped in 1937.
The latest thing in Transportation Design? Hardly, the German Zeppelin corporation was 3 times faster on the same voyage, and every bit the equal in luxury. To add insult it injury, none of the Olympic Class ships would respond the the helm, the rudders were too small. They all burned through coal at 3 times the rate of the competition.
You want to imply that this means there were lots of successful cruise ships, thus building this trio was a great idea. Lets ignore the details, "we don't need DON'T NEED ANOTHER OCK HISTORY LESSON, to hell with the yardstick of time, education, and most of all EXPERIENCE. Otherwise we would be building the best system for the money..."OCKLAWAHA Stephendare, Lakelander, Y'all ready for that life preserver yet?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
tufsu1
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: November 01, 2009, 08:17:29 PM » |
|
Thats because they travelled at High Speed.
What does that have to do with the Orlando Tampa line?
168mph isn't high speed?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
thelakelander
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: November 01, 2009, 08:26:14 PM » |
|
Its going to get up to 168mph between Tampa and Orlando's airport? What stretch and for how long?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|