Okay help me out here people... Mr. Crescimbeni wrote me back and told me that he read the article. Here's what he asked me and I could use some help on what to answer back...
1) Am I to conclude that "refit" for Amtrak is synonymous with "demolition" of existing Convention Center
exhibition space?
Immediately? No. However, eventually its best for both the convention and transportation center's future to relocate the convention facility to an area that will allow it to grow and succeed.
What you see in both this presentation and JTA's plan is a
long range master plan that could take more than a decade to put in place. Certain components, like Amtrak, can come back with the convention center still in tact. However, over time, the convention facility will have to be removed if we want our tax dollars to be utilized in a fashion that creates two efficient public facilities. If we want both to fail and remain substandard, leaving the convention center at the terminal is the way to go.
2) Where would you propose that events requiring extensive exhibition space be held?" If you are proposing to demolish exhibition space, your tweaking of the JTA Mater Plan had best include an answer to that question as
well - or I wouldn't consider it a viable one.
This idea ties three major city redevelopment sites together. Those sites are the new county courthouse, the existing Bay Street courthouse and the train terminal together. The long term idea is that once the courthouse relocates to LaVilla, the Bay Street property becomes the site of a new improved convention facility. This location provides our convention center will several complementing factors that any center will need as a minimum to be a success. That is:
1. A convention center hotel already in place in the form of the Hyatt.
2. A entertainment district already in place in the form of East Bay Street and the Florida Theater.
3. Connectivity with the urban core in the form of the riverwalk.
4. Restaurant and dining facilities in the form of the Landing.
Building a new or expanding the convention center is much more complex than adding an exhibition hall box. The actual construction of a convention box should be the least of Jacksonville's concerns. Connectivity, synergy and integration with complementing uses to build a compact walkable district should be the highest priority with this issue.
The thing no one discusses is the fact that if the convention center remains in LaVilla, these things will have to be provided and most likely incentivized to put our convention center in a situation in where it can efficiently compete against centers in peer cities that already offer these assets. We can certainly go that route, but why subsidize new complementing development to compete against those who have already invested in these uses within the downtown core?
With that said, once the Prime Osborn is out of the train terminal, you then have the opportunity to completely use that site for what it was originally designed for. That is a compact, well organized intermodal transportation complex.