I personally am trying to ascertain if you care about these issues, or if you are simply backing what has lots of popularity down there.
Well, I happen to care about these issues. Given my own background it's easy to acertain authenticity. Heck I have a sister living in Europe ( in her forties) who has NEVER yet owned a car.
My personal experience says enough. I'm not beholden to special interests, and have been a citizen advocate on healthcare long enough to have made my marks for the people's interests.
Now if you are looking for someone who is a corporatist, which you can find in both parties, you are not going to find that in me. That doesn't mean I am against corporations,.........my dad worked for Philips Electronics all of his life, and they paid for my master's degree through their scholarship program. I too have worked for major corporations myself: Nestle, Kaiser Parmanente and Blue Cross/Blue Shield.
I have had the fortune to live in the far east and the middle east, as well as being born in Colombia, because my dad was stationed overseas while he worked for a multi-national company.
Though government can help facilitate things for corporations ( infrastructure is a prime example), it should also be there to protect the people from corporate excesses. It's the corporate excesses to caused our recent economic collapse.
Mostly I think government should put policies in place that help small businesses, as they supply 70% of our employment.
On HSR, I think downtown to downtown connections are preferable, that is how it's done in Europe, although there are train stations at every airport as well. Florida is different from other places in the US, because of its high tourist component.
Heck, we all know that our economy has been based on agriculture, tourism and construction. Not much diversification to speak of compared to others areas in the US.
We can either ignore the tourist component or we can capitalize on it. As an economist, I prefer to capitalize on it. And the notion of stopping at every little town along the Tampa-Orlando route as lakelander has suggested is ludicrous, as it completely negates the HSR notion.
The HSR I took in Europe as I visited my parents this past Jan. didn't stop at every little town along the way either. If I wanted that I could have taken the "stop" train.
The distance was the same as Tampa-Orlando,.........Amsterdam-Eindhoven, and they only had one stop at Utrecht.
Of coures you all have debated all these issues ad nauseum on these boards, and there is definitely a lot of expertise here, but I too can have serious opinions that may differ from some of the group think that can occur when people hang out a lot with each other. I always back up my stuff with sourcing as you know. I enjoy researching and learning.
The one congressman did not show up on the list backing HSR in Florida, that is a pure fact, indisputable.
So in this case I don't think there is a difficulty going through the evaluation as laid out by you:
With so much criticism of mica its more difficult, because I have to stop and decide whether your point is
a. Accurate
b. sourced,
c. a reflection of how you feel
d. just an attempt to raise the negatives on mica.
I am only testing the waters in terms of running again. Knowing that incumbents win 95% of the time, makes elections a real farce. The only way to level the playing field is for publicly financed campaigns.
It's no wonder nothing ever gets done, incumbents have no reason to to listen to the needs of the people. We will forever be stuck with career politicians unless we stop making excuses for them, and vote them out.