Saying you want to get rid of the ferry because it costs money is kinda like saying you won't feed your kids anymore because it is to expensive. KIDS EAT, TO CROSS A RIVER COSTS MONEY, just look at how many times taxpayers have paid to fix and paint the mathews bridge and the estimated expense of building a new one. Or just a smaller example, how much does it cost to maintain and keep a bridge tender (whatever the person is called who raises the bridge) where people who live in ortega cross on ortega blvd?
Why isn't there a comparison of what it normally cost to maintain a bridge and what the ferry costs,(after income) then its probably a bargain
Sounds a lot like the arguments rail and skyway backers continue to make to the general population here in town. As for constructing a new bridge, the Matthews replacement was estimated to cost around $800 million a few years ago. If a vehicular crossing was the goal at Mayport, it would have to be a tunnel (probably costs more) instead of a bridge.