Sunday, March 21, 2010
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
 
Join Metro Jacksonville and get in on the conversation today!Already have an account?  Sign In
March 21, 2010, 06:07:30 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: You can now find us on facebook and twitter.
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2] 3
  Print  
Author Topic: JEA's Greenland Energy Center coming to the Southside  (Read 3081 times)
thelakelander
Metro Jacksonville
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 8966


« Reply #15 on: July 10, 2008, 09:10:48 AM »

Quote
5,530 acres of solar panels to produce the 553 MW that JEA's new plant will produce.

That could be a problem.
Logged
BridgeTroll
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4925


The average person thinks he isn’t


WWW
« Reply #16 on: July 10, 2008, 09:21:55 AM »

This reality makes solar a complement to traditional electricity generation, not a replacement.  Seems more suited for individual homes, businesses, or governments.  Seems to me that wind power would fall into the same category.  Large tracts of land covered in windmills to generate the same power as a traditional plant.
Logged

In a boat at sea one of the men began to bore a hole in the bottom of the boat. On being remonstrating with, he answered, "I am only boring under my own seat." "Yes," said his companions, "but when the sea rushes in we shall all be drowned with you."
Jason
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3199


I am the man in the box...


« Reply #17 on: July 10, 2008, 09:25:04 AM »

Exactly.  On a small scale solar make a lot of sence but on a power company scale, not so much.

Note that there are other technologies out there that are more compact or use the solar radiation to generate a steam driven turbine and can take up less space, however, they still require vast amounts of land and are more expensive to implement and maintain.
Logged
Doctor_K
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 764


Rodimus Prime in training


WWW
« Reply #18 on: July 10, 2008, 09:26:10 AM »

Agree.  

This discussion makes me start to wonder, though, how much the technology of both PV/Solar and Wind will advance and evolve in the next 20 years or so.  Makes me excited to see what's coming next!
Logged

Jason
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3199


I am the man in the box...


« Reply #19 on: July 10, 2008, 09:29:19 AM »

The technology is there, it just needs to be implemented.  I've seen gobs of shows on Discovery, TLC, and History channels touting gobs of revolutionary new technologies.  It just takes tons of money and tons of time to get them out of the lab an into mass use.

When you get a free moment just try Googling "solar technology" or "future energy".  You'll be amazed.
Logged
BridgeTroll
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4925


The average person thinks he isn’t


WWW
« Reply #20 on: July 10, 2008, 09:51:54 AM »

No doubt the technology is there but it still is not cost effective enough nor is it efficient enough to replace conventional sources.  Coal, oil, and gas will continue for the forseeable future to be the generator of choice for the vast majority of humans on this planet...
Logged

In a boat at sea one of the men began to bore a hole in the bottom of the boat. On being remonstrating with, he answered, "I am only boring under my own seat." "Yes," said his companions, "but when the sea rushes in we shall all be drowned with you."
bde269
Newbie
*
Posts: 1


« Reply #21 on: April 10, 2009, 01:19:16 PM »

i want to work there and be part of the start up crew i work at a 550 mw combine cycle plant and want to be down south
Logged
NotNow
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 930


« Reply #22 on: April 10, 2009, 05:59:50 PM »

There should be state and federal tax credits to reimburse at least 75% cost of a typical residential or small business installation.  A four to eight panel system with batteries and inverter to supply at least 75% of electricity used.  Same for the "plug in" electric car.  This is where "stimulus" money should be spent.  This would IMMEDIATLY reduce the need for foreign oil, create jobs and stimulate research and competition in this field.
Logged
mtraininjax
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1713


Is it 2011 yet?


« Reply #23 on: April 11, 2009, 02:42:15 AM »

With so much coal available, it seems silly not to use it, or Nuclear over more difficult to reach natural gas. Anyone heard about Peak oil reserves being reached? All the easy energy has been found, newer deposits (oil and nat gas) will require more drilling and more expenses.

Again, coal is easier to find, we know where it is and to mine it as well. If we can spend 3 trillion bucks in Iraq, we can figure out ways to clean coal emissions.
Logged

And, that $115 will save Jacksonville from financial ruin. - Mayor John Peyton

If it floats, flies or fornicates.....rent it!
Lunican
Metro Jacksonville
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2634



WWW
« Reply #24 on: June 22, 2009, 09:29:40 PM »

Quote
JEA power plant project moves forward
Two natural gas-powered turbines to cost $205 million

The recession pushed back building plans for the Greenland Energy Center, but now the Jacksonville power project is moving forward with a cheaper price tag.

Two natural gas-powered combustion turbines, each able to generate 177 megawatts, will cost JEA $205 million — about $45 million below previous estimates, the city-owned utility said last week.
Full article:
http://www.jacksonville.com/news/metro/2009-06-22/story/jea_power_plant_project_moves_forward
Logged
Jason
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3199


I am the man in the box...


« Reply #25 on: June 23, 2009, 10:37:16 AM »

In the short term, this is good news that the plant is moving forward because it will add redundancy and flexibility to the grid.  The bad news is that the sole reason this plant is necessary is because of the sprawl that has taken place in southern Duval and northern St. Johns.  This plant will only aid future development, IMO.

Still, we should brace for a likely rate hike.  JEA should still be at the lower end when compared to other utilities, but not as low as they are today.
Logged
copperfiend
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1515


« Reply #26 on: June 23, 2009, 10:52:02 AM »

They closed the driving range too early. It is sitting there rotting. Damn you JEA!!!
Logged
Ocklawaha
Phd. Ferroequinology
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4945


Lightning Slinging Monster of Mobility!


WWW
« Reply #27 on: June 23, 2009, 12:26:06 PM »

In Oklahoma and Texas alone, there must be 6000 torches burning off the NG from the well fields. One would think we'd be looking for a way to capture ALL of it for use. Any JEA types on here know if they'll capture the exhust heat for a steam turbine?

As for the Coal Quesiton, I'm all for it if we could burn Anthracite (clean) coal. Otherwise, we'd need to build the plant in Hilliard or maybe Kings Bay.


OCKLAWAHA
Logged

MOST MAJOR WORLD CITIES AGE LIKE A FINE WINE - JACKSONVILLE HAS AGED LIKE MILK

FOR INFORMATION ON MASS TRANSIT SEE:
ALL TRANSIT: 
http://jacksonvilletransit.blogspot.com/
LRT TRANSIT: 
http://www.freewebs.com/lightrailjacksonville/
reednavy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1621



« Reply #28 on: June 23, 2009, 12:31:49 PM »

JEA has espressed possible nuclear power in the future. I'd expect that plant to be built probably along the St. Mary's River in Baker County or Charlton County, GA.
Logged

Jacksonville: We're not vertically challenged, just horizontally gifted!
Traveller
Full Member
***
Posts: 152



« Reply #29 on: June 23, 2009, 01:37:53 PM »

With all the timber located in and around the First Coast region, I wonder whether JEA has considered cellulosic biomass as a fuel source.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Copyright 2010 MetroJacksonville.com
Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC