This area is NO Charlotte and it's NO Austin.
Btw, the Austin image is of the Satillo Lofts project. That particular area of Austin is no panacea. The city is taking advantage of the new rail metrorail line to renovate this blighted industrial area into a transit oriented development district centered around a new rail stop.
full article:
Here Comes the Neighborhood -
www.austinchronicle.com/gyrobase/Issue/story?oid=oid:165619VERY interesting piece....thanks for sharing.
Ya know what stood out in my read of it...how the city of Austin involved the community in the planning of this revitalization. The article's author used the word "partnership" to describe the relationship between the residents, city and developers.
Sadly for us, there's one of the major differences between Austin and Jax. At this point, Jackson Sq. at San Marco looks to be a prime example of a major neighborhood redevelopment initiative that has been created and, as we're learning, almost executed without any direct community involvement.
If this is the first phase in a major city-sponsored revitalization of Phillips Hwy, it would make sense for the city to approach it that way and get neighbors/taxpayers engaged and involved. But that doesn't appear to be the case here.
Another thing that's interesting to many of us is how this hasn't even received a whiff of interest from the T-U or Folio. Someone is buying up/taking over homes on Mitchell Avenue and closing that street now, they are demo'ing the Jerry Hamm property and have put up a big, pretty sign (with a scene of the San Marco gazebo and fountain) with a website for info (
www.jacksonsquareatsanmarco.com).
Yet no media have even wondered what's going on there, who's being affected, what the city's role in this is, what the taxpayer impact will be...there's a JEA pumping station in that area, there's a railroad crossing that will need to be upgraded or closed, there are traffic lights and street realignment (with property that will need to be bought by the city or the developer for the road realignment) -- who pays for all of this?
Will they only get interested when it's on the city council's agenda? Just curious.