I'm sure we all know what kind of debt Cortland was able to secure (can justify higher pricing with very strong debt), exactly what the cap rate on in-place was, and conversely what the in-place rental rates were/occupancy/concessions. I'm sure we all know how the expenses are running at that property, just like I'm sure we all know how rental rate growth has been in that particular area over the past 3 or 12 months.
For an infill garden community with a lot of upside potential (new paint job, new microwaves or what not), and a heated rental market with more and more demand for mid-level product in the city as new, more expensive developments dominate all new units being constructed, I'm sure Cortland, with their many years of experience underwrote that deal with far more facts than we have at hand on this site. FTR $72K/unit for a vintage infill B-class community doesn't sound that unreasonable. It costs $100-$125K/unit for new suburban class "a" garden style construction, and it costs at least twice as much all-in for infill construction like that being constructed in Brooklyn. If they are budgeting $20K/unit for improvements to bring it to B+ material just below new suburban garden style quality, and they are going to achieve typical suburban class A garden style rents based on location, then I'd say that's probably a great deal!
And nobody is dumb enough to pay less than a 5%, maybe even a 5.5% or 6% cap rate on in-place for anything in Jax. It's not that kind of market...lenders won't support it and acquisitions teams all across the SE recognize this city for what it is: a risky opportunistic town subject to massive cycles.