| The Plight of the Urban Core |
|
|
| Thursday, 09 October 2008 | |
|
A look at the rise and fall of the Urban Core's population with the help of pre-consolidation city limit maps and census tracts. The original city limit boundaries of 1832 consisted of the Bay Street riverfront and the Cathedral District.
In 1842, the city's boundaries extended north along Hogans Creek and west to Clay Street. The city would remain this size until the annexation of 1887.
1850 Census - 1,045 1860 Census - 2,118 1870 Census - 6,912 1880 Census - 7,650 A historic aerial of Pensacola The 1880 Census would show that Jacksonville replaced Pensacola as Florida's largest city.
In 1887, several suburbs were annexed into Jacksonville. They included LaVilla, Brooklyn, Riverside, Springfield, Durkeeville, East Jacksonville, Fairfield and Oakland.
1890 Census - 17,201 1900 Census - 28,429 1910 Census - 57,699
In 1919, the city expanded north to Long Branch Creek and Moncrief Park. An expansion to the west also bought a portion of Avondale into the city limits.
1920 Census - 91,558
The annexation of 1925 would be Jacksonville's largest until consolidation. Panama Park, Ortega, Moncrief Park and the city of Murray Hill were included in this expansion.
1930 Census - 129,549
There were several small scale expansions of the city limits during the 1930s. These included annexations of the Ostrich farm property in 1931 and the city of South Jacksonville in 1932. Jacksonville's land area would remain the same size until consolidation.
1940 Census - 173,065 Downtown Miami around the time the city became Florida's largest. With 172,172 residents, the City of Miami was right on Jacksonville's heels in 1940. By 1950, Miami became Florida's largest city with 249,276 residents. 1950 Census - 204,275 Downtown Tampa in 1960. During this decade, the old city would peak and begin to decline in population. In the middle of a boom, the city of Tampa would pass Jacksonville in population with 274,970 residents by 1960. St. Petersburg, Tampa's neighbor across the bay, would come close with 181,298 residents. 1960 Census - 201,031 The declining city merged with Duval County in 1968, helping mask the problems of the decaying Inner City and regain the status of Florida's largest city. Downtown's darkest days would occur in the decades to follow but high suburban growth rates would hide the urban core's rapid population loss. 1970 Census - 528,865 1980 Census - 540,920 1990 Census - 635,230 2000 Census - 735,503 2007 Census estimate - 805,605 While the official 2000 census records show Jacksonville with an impressive 15.8% growth rate, a look at census tract records reveal a completely different story. Jacksonville's current inner city census tracts are nearly identical to the pre-consolidated city boundaries from the 1940 census.
2000 Census City Population: 735,503 2000 Old City Census Tract Population: 112,753 1950 Old City Population: 204,517 Net Urban Core Loss (1950 - 2000): -91,764 2000 Census City Population Density: 735,503 / 758.7 square miles = 969 2000 Old City Census Tract Density: 112,753 / 30.2 square miles = 3,734 1950 Old City Population Density: 204,517 / 30.2 square miles = 6,772 Net Urban Core Loss (1950 - 2000): - 3,038 residents per mile These numbers show that our urban core's population loss during the late 20th century was very similar to older industrial cities such as Detroit, Cincinnati, Pittsburgh and Birmingham. These numbers also show that the Urban Core has the infrastructure in place to support twice as many residents than live there today. As Jacksonville continues to deal with sprawl, congestion, limited road expansion funds and higher gas and energy costs, our focus on growth needs to shift back to the area that is already laid out to support higher densities. Article by Ennis Davis |

October 9, 2008, 5:39 am
Re: The Plight of the Urban Core
Great article.
Let's all think, somebody!
October 9, 2008, 8:17 am
Re: The Plight of the Urban Core
Great thread! I always knew this, and laid it out in numerous posts and threads. If our beloved Jax still had the old city boundaries/census tracts, we'd be smaller than tallahassee and gainesville, and would have the appearance of a much larger City but with a small city population.
Our City Leaders have not changed. The City Leaders in the 1950's should have taken steps then to keep people in the inner city and old city boundaries. It appears that because nothing was done and no one took the loss of population seriously, our City went into a downslide of no return. Our recent and current City Leaders are no different than the ones in the 1950's; they seem to not care about instigating prosperity, growth, etc. in the inner city/old city boundaries; they try, but don't try hard enough.
Though Jax has a huge population because of consolidation, other Florida cities know that they are much more prosperous, larger, successful, and have a larger population (inside of the respective city boundaries and not because of consolidation); and I think that's why they don't really "push the issue" relative to Jax's population because of consolidation.
People do make a City; buildings, attractions, industries, etc. don't; and if this is true, then Jax is really lacking in the inner city and old city boundaries. Government/Leaders need to really focus more attention in these areas of the City.
Heights Unknown
October 9, 2008, 8:29 am
Re: The Plight of the Urban Core
Without consolidation, we would be very similar to a Hartford, Norfolk or Richmond. A small stagnant core city population with a skyline built for an urban area with a much larger population.
One thing that is striking is the decline of Downtown's population base. In 1880, a fraction of what is now today's Northbank, had 7,650 residents. Now the entire downtown area (both banks) have less than 3,000.
October 9, 2008, 9:16 am
Re: The Plight of the Urban Core
I'm all for higher population density in the core, but I question the claim that the Urban Core has the infrastructure in place to support it. The claim may be accurate if the infrastructure in the core and core communities had been maintained. After decades of neglect and fiscal allocations that favored sprawl, the infrastructure updates/upgrades necessary to support past densities are significant.
Agreed! But our city councilmembers continue to "lead" based on geographic self-interest, rather than what might be right for the future and sustainability of the entire city of Jacksonville.
October 9, 2008, 9:41 am
Re: The Plight of the Urban Core
While there are areas that certainly need upgrades, they do have paved streets, street lights, predeveloped land, water/sewer lines, an impressive street grid/expressway network, bridges, stoplights, parks, sidewalks, etc. Densities are also at a level that make using mass transit more of a realistic posibility, thus reducing the need to spend hundreds of millions for new highways. When you look at things from a wholistic point of view, its still a cheaper investment for the community than building all of these things from scratch into virgin undeveloped and environmentally sensitive areas.
October 9, 2008, 10:44 am
Re: The Plight of the Urban Core
Did anyone catch the Channel 4 special on the anniversary of consolidation? They aired an original breakdown of the city and couty governments and gave great insight into the duplication of government and services in duval county. A very educational peice.
October 9, 2008, 11:34 am
Re: The Plight of the Urban Core
One boom missed. In Feb.- Summer of 1864, the populaiton swelled to over 25,000. But they was all Yankees and we ran them the hell out of town!! Lincolns, little birthday gift from the good folks of Florida - OLUSTEE!
Funny thing is, the town was so impressive to those Damned Yankees (which burned it down 4 times - starting with our churches) that many thousands returned to make this there home after the war. So if Jacksonville has always had the NY-NJ feel? Well Duh! Guess who came for dinner? AND STAYED?
Orlando-Tallahassee-St. Pete-Tampa-Miami-West Palm didn't have the benefit of Yankee money or industrial know how and it took them a CENTURY to catch us. We simply changed the rules... CHECK MATE!
OCKLAWAHA
DEO VINDICE!!
What are the benefits of having a MetroJacksonville.com account?
- Share your opinion by posting comments on stories that interest you.
- Stay up to date on all of the latest issues affecting your neighborhood.
- Create a network of friends working towards a better Jacksonville.
>> Register now <<