Friday, September 5thAdvertising  |  About Us  |  Contact Us
Springfield vs. Savannah: Can you tell the difference? Print E-mail
Friday, 20 June 2008

Savannah's Victorian District and Thomas Square Streetcar Districts have a lot in common with Jacksonville's Springfield Historic District.  Can you tell the difference between Springfield and Savannah?

Inner City Savannah Map 

Savannah Victorian Historic District

Originally a parade ground and the extension of street railways in the late 19th century, the Savannah Victorian Historic District is the city's first suburb.

It is bordered by Gwinnett Street on the north, Anderson on the south, MLK on the west and Broad Street on the east.

 

Thomas Square Streetcar Historic District

Thomas Square Streetcar Historic District is named for Thomas Square Park, which lies near the center of the district, and the streetcar lines that made this neighborhood feasible in the late 1800's.  The Starland Design area at Bull Street and Victory have quickly become a haven for artists, mainly by the influence of Savannah College of Art and Design.

With over 1,100 historic residential, commercial, and community buildings it is one of the largest historic districts in Savannah.  It is bounded by Anderson Lane on the north, Broad Street on the east, Victory Drive on the south and Montgomery Street on the west.

 

Savannah or Jacksonville? Can you tell the difference?

1.

 

2.

 

3.

 

4.

 

 

5.

 

 

6.

 

7.

 

8.

 

9.

 

10.

 

11.

 

 

12.

 

13.

 

14.

 

 

15.

 

16.

 

 

17.

 

18.

 

19.

 

 

20.

 

Commonalities:

1. Both were developed around the Turn of the Century.

2. Both have gridded streets and are located within walking distance of their respective city's downtown core.

3. Both have wide streets that offer parallel parking and mature vegetation.

Savannah

4. Both are located adjacent to large urban parks that were developed to serve as a central public gathering space between them and the downtown core.

5. Both have compact historic housing stock with minimal front yard setbacks.

6. Both contain historic building fabric that exhibit similar architectural styles and building materials.

 

Jacksonville's Springfield

 

Savannah's historic districts are nearly equal in size to the combined land area of Jacksonville's Northbank and Springfield.

 


Differences:

1. One contains a network of bike lanes that provide direct access between them and their downtown.  The other does not.

Savannah's Thomas Square Streetcar District

2. One contains a vibrant urban park that remains the centerpiece of its urban community.  The other's park system has taken a back seat to the river, thus the downtown has now turned its back to its southern border.

3. One is fully integrated with the downtown core to the north.  The other has seen high levels of demolition that now creates a dead no-man's zone between it and downtown.

Jacksonville: Laura Street between 1st Street and State Street serves as a part of "no-man's" land between Springfield and Downtown.

 

4. One has a street grid that has been maintained allowing multiple ways to move between multiple urban districts.  The other was cut off from its downtown, with street closings and one way conversions making it difficult to move between districts.


 Savannah: Streets connecting the urban districts offer several ways to move between the communities.

 

5. One city respects the pedestrian.  The other still favors the automobile.

 Savannah: Pedestrian crossing signs help warn drivers that there are pedestrians in the area.

 

Savannah images: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 14, 16, 17 & 19

Springfield images: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 15, 18 & 20

Article by Ennis Davis

 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Latest Features

Latest News

Related Articles

Dancey Terrace Photo Tour
The extremely controversial and long delayed Dancey Terrace has finally opened a model home to the public. These twenty-four 1,000 square foot bungalows were slated...
New Loft Project Breaks Ground in Springfield
Despite a slow down in Jacksonville's residential market, The Cesery Companies' Lofts on Main development is apparently moving forward. Originally proposed as a luxury condominium...
Forgotten Jacksonville: New Springfield
Despite boasting a decent amount of historic building fabric and being located within close proximity to downtown, New Springfield remains one of Jacksonville's most ignored...
>> 17 Comments
civil42806
June 20, 2008, 7:56 am
Re: Springfield vs. Savannah: Can you tell the difference?

used to live katty cornered from the Kroger.  Green growth community,was bunch of delapidated buildings.  Bought up by a development company renovated.
Jason
June 20, 2008, 8:54 am
Re: Springfield vs. Savannah: Can you tell the difference?

The Kroger pic was the only one I knew for sure was Savannah.  I honestly thought Ennis was going to throw a curveball and show only Springfield pics.


Great article too.  Goes to show that Jacksonville's historic districts are up to par or superior to many other more recognized districts around the country.
civil42806
June 20, 2008, 10:47 am
Re: Springfield vs. Savannah: Can you tell the difference?

I think stating that jax's historic district is up to par with Savannahs, is pressing the envelope just a bit.
downtownparks
June 20, 2008, 12:20 pm
Re: Springfield vs. Savannah: Can you tell the difference?

Actually Civil, if you read the article you will see its the Victorian District of Savannah, not downtown.  Springfield shares many of the same challenges as the outer Victorian District, and could probably stand to learn some of their lessons, and avoid some of their failures.
civil42806
June 20, 2008, 12:53 pm
Re: Springfield vs. Savannah: Can you tell the difference?

That may be true, that area is not as well developed, as the historic district.  That area is more comparable with Spingfiield, particualrly after dar.  But many of the photos in the article are from the downtown historic district north of liberty street or between gwinnett and liberty.
thelakelander
June 20, 2008, 1:10 pm
Re: Springfield vs. Savannah: Can you tell the difference?

Every photograph comparing the two (the numbered images) are from the actual districts (Victorian, Thomas, Springfield) themselves.  Every Savannah image in this section was taken within these district's respective borders

The photographs outside of the number ones are intended to give viewers a visual idea of how these districts connect with their downtown districts.  In this section there are images of Savannah that were taken north of Forsyth Park that are included.  By the same token, there's an image of Laura Street that is officially outside of Springfield's borders.  Nevertheless, the purpose of the non-numbered images are to visually display how one neighborhood is physically integrated with its downtown core (with pedestrian signage, bike lanes, through streets, sidewalks with buildings fronting them, etc.) and the other isn't. 
heights unknown
June 20, 2008, 9:12 pm
Re: Springfield vs. Savannah: Can you tell the difference?

You can definitely tell the difference.  The houses in Savannah's Victorian District are mostly all painted and have ironed fences.  The majority of the victorian houses in Springfield do not have the ironed fences, and most are not painted as good or as bright, and are not as well kept; and.......there seem to be more houses in Savannah's historic district that are renovated whereas Springfield still has a large number of houses sitting and not yet renovated.  Also, the streets in Savannah in the Victorian District seem much more cleaner, tapered, and better kept than Springfield's streets; so if you look closely, you can definitely tell the difference.

Heights Unknown
downtownparks
June 20, 2008, 9:18 pm
Re: Springfield vs. Savannah: Can you tell the difference?

Ok, Heights. Email me (downtownparks@gmail.com) from top to bottom which is which. I know several are obvious (like the Krogers) but I bet you will find your self quite surprised at which ones are which.
civil42806
June 21, 2008, 7:30 am
Re: Springfield vs. Savannah: Can you tell the difference?

The other big difference is that the outlying area such as the victorian district is anchored by the actual historic district.  Whereas Springfield is still somewhat isolated.  I lived just at the corner of Price and Gwinnett just on the edge of the historic district.  I have to agree with a previous poster that the streets in the Victory area are much wider, better landscaped and much better maintained.  Was looking at buying a condo on Victory, just opposite the Sand Gnats baseball park, the area immediately behind it turned into a slum for several blocks before it started to pick back up as you approached gwinnett
thelakelander
June 21, 2008, 7:46 am
Re: Springfield vs. Savannah: Can you tell the difference?

Quote
The other big difference is that the outlying area such as the victorian district is anchored by the actual historic district.  Whereas Springfield is still somewhat isolated.

This is probably the largest difference.  Jacksonville needs to find a way to reconnect Downtown and Springfield with building density between the Springfield Parks System and Union Street.


At one time, Springfield and Downtown met at Hogans Creek.
strider
June 22, 2008, 11:18 am
Re: Springfield vs. Savannah: Can you tell the difference?

Good article and I agree that perhaps the largest difference is that Springfield is disconnected from Downtown.  In fact, there is actually very little "historic" left in between Springfield and Downtown.

Out of curiousity, were any of the pictures from Savanah of new houses or were they all historic ones?  I noticed that at least three of the houses pictured from Springfield were new and wondered if they were building infill in Savanah the same way.
civil42806
June 24, 2008, 7:17 pm
Re: Springfield vs. Savannah: Can you tell the difference?

"Good article and I agree that perhaps the largest difference is that Springfield is disconnected from Downtown.  In fact, there is actually very little "historic" left in between Springfield and Downtown.

Out of curiousity, were any of the pictures from Savanah of new houses or were they all historic ones?  I noticed that at least three of the houses pictured from Springfield were new and wondered if they were building infill in Savanah the same way."

There is some that I saw Strider but mostly on the edges, IN the area I lived, there were some very run down building demolished and some newer row housing being constructed to fit into the area.  They were very nice and very pricey, a little too much for the area in my mind.   But that was the exception to the rule.  Almost all of the original housing from the victory disctrict to the water front is intact.  Also keep in mind either by accident or plan, Savannah tore down very little of the cotton factor are along river street, so you have a very charming front facing the river.   They made one mistake and demolished a pocket park for the redevelopment of the city market.  They have since realized the mistake, and are building an underground garage on the site and reestablishing the park on top, will be interesting to see how that holds up.
JaxNative68
June 27, 2008, 1:30 pm
Re: Springfield vs. Savannah: Can you tell the difference?

A few candid and cleverly orchestrated photographs can make any two cities look similar.  What you really need to compare is the vitality and atmosphere of the both areas.  I was born and raised in Jacksonville, and having lived in Savannah and a couple of other historic cities for roughly 15+ years before returning to back Jacksonville, I think I can give an honest opinion to this subject.  There is no comparison between the two cities, Savannah by far, has a huge edge over Springfield.  Springfield has been a waste land for as long as I can remember.  Decade after decade promises are made about revitalization projects that will take root and improve the area, but decade after decade it always looks the same and has the same atmosphere.   It is a shame, Springfield has a some beautiful architecture and a ton of potential, but until the city inhabitants return to living and working in the downtown area in great numbers, Springfield doesn’t have a chance.  People are not going to live in Springfield and drive to work in one of the many suburban office parks that have destroyed downtown Jacksonville;  not to mention no local shopping, no safe place to send your child to school, or no safe place for your child to play.  I wish it were different, but it isn't.

If you truely want to compare a Jacksonville area to Savannah, try Riverside, Avondale or San Marco; but please, not Springfield.
downtownparks
June 27, 2008, 2:09 pm
Re: Springfield vs. Savannah: Can you tell the difference?

Native, your take isn't completly off the mark, but I think the word "wasteland" is vastly overstated. Springfield is far from utopia, but I have to tell you as a 5 year resident of Springfield, the most frustrating aspect of the neighborhood to me is how Native Jaxons are so quick to dish on it, and tell everyone how bad it is.

I just wish people from here weren't so willing to disregard a neighborhood that so many of them have roots in. Its kinda sad. This is a fun vibrant neighborhood that admittedly has some hurdles in front of it, but wasteland is just about as far from the truth as you can get.
thelakelander
June 27, 2008, 2:31 pm
Re: Springfield vs. Savannah: Can you tell the difference?

Also, Savannah has several historic districts.  This comparison takes a look at two that are south of the well known Downtown Historic District.  The Thomas Square Streetcar District is very similar to the feel and atmosphere of today's Springfield.  The largest difference is, its connected pretty well to the two historic district to the north.  Springfield's ties with Downtown Jax have been severed and need to be re-established.
Steve
July 2, 2008, 9:20 pm
Re: Springfield vs. Savannah: Can you tell the difference?

I think some of you guys are missing the point.

Ennis, correct me if I'm wrong (since you wrote it), but the point of this is not to show that Savannah and Springfield are hard to tell apart per se.  What I got out of this is that Springfield has many of the ingredients of a successful historic district, like Springfield.  However there are things that Savannah has and takes advantage of that Jacksonville does not, such as the connectivity thing with the surrounding neighborhoods.

And also, I think the wasteland comment might have been true a while ago, but take a trip down there and other than Main St, most of the streets are quite plesant.
thelakelander
July 2, 2008, 9:45 pm
Re: Springfield vs. Savannah: Can you tell the difference?

Yes, Steve you got the point.  Architecture and history aside, one is integrated with its downtown core and the other isn't.  If we can reconnect the two, both benefit.
Welcome Guest. You must be logged in to comment on this story.

What are the benefits of having a MetroJacksonville.com account?
  • Share your opinion by posting comments on stories that interest you.
  • Stay up to date on all of the latest issues affecting your neighborhood.
  • Create a network of friends working towards a better Jacksonville.
>> Register now <<
Already have an account? Login now to comment.