|
“There is probable cause that some Jacksonville elected officials violated state law by failing to report as gifts taxpayer-financed outings to football games, concerts and other events BUT THEY SHOULD NOT BE PUNISHED.” (emphasis added).
That’s the first sentence in an article in today’s Florida Times-Union . Let’s think about that for a second. Okay. Local officials violated state law. But they shouldn’t be punished. Great. Why, you might ask? Well, as the article continues, the report of the Florida Commission on Ethics feels that these evildoers have now changed their ways, repented for all their sins, and have promised, really really promised, to be good and never do it again. Phew. I sure believe that and have a new found trust and belief in the honesty and righteousness of our elected officials.
Unfortunately, some naysayers and killjoyers like local attorney Leslie Goller aren’t as appeased. “If there is no penalty for ethics violations, it will just be business as usual here,” the article quotes her. NO! That can’t be true. When the fox says he’ll play nice with the hens, or when the scorpion promises he won’t sting the frog, you have to believe them.
Well, no, you don’t. Why? Because this week saw the trifecta of wrist slapping, eye winking and turning a blind eye. As above, apparently violating state laws regarding improper gifting is okay, as long as you form some kind of toothless committee, appoint some incompetent Ethics Officer, and re-write a law that was already written which was pretty clear in the "what not to do" category in the first place.
So what else did our city officials get away with this week? Oh, yeah. Violating Florida’s open meeting laws and improperly awarding no-bid contracts to Peyton’s cronies and former senior staff members.
As for the former, you may remember that a few of our city council members, in an apparently excusable violation of Florida’s Sunshine Law, thought it okay to meet for a meal and discuss city business at a local diner without bothering to, I don’t know, follow any of the notification and reporting requirements of the Sunshine Law. Over 300 calendared meetings were examined, with potential flaws and violations found in dozens of them. So how did the investigation into this resolve? The Grand Jury found violations but, you guessed it, no criminal wrongdoing. Again, Phew. Our council members have thwarted another sticky career ending penalty by promising to play nice and, oh yeah, by the rules.
So how about the latter? You know, the no-bid contract issue. Well, let’s see. Scott Teagle is a close friend of Mayor Peyton and former chief of staff who left his noble civil service job in 2004, opting instead for a lucrative career in the private sector taking advantage of his cronyistic ties to start ProLogic and seek improper and, if not illegal, then definitely smelly, no contract bids with the city. His payoff? Over $500,000.00 in technology contracts that ProLogic was unqualified to receive.
Okay. So what happened to Scott and those involved in this non-scandal. Well, the same Grand Jury that looked into the Sunshine Law violations determined that these contracts were improperly awarded, but again, did not go so far as to find criminal wrongdoing.
Therein lies the trifecta. Get free tickets on the DL? No problem. An unannounced, unreported breakfast amongst city council members? Why not just let the taxpayer get the check? Get an illegal, half million dollar city contract ? Who’s watching?
While we have to live with these apparently minor indiscretions, and no fines or jail time will be meted out, I find it difficult to swallow that, at best, our city government is rife with utter incompetence and, at worst, devoid of a single ethical and moral fiber. Rudy Guiliani would surely be proud.
Finally, as a footnote really, and while we’re talking about the upstanding character that is our city government and its elected officials, I can’t help but mention a cute little event that happened last week. City Councilman Art, “I swear I’m not addicted to pain killers anymore” Shad, in an apparent attempt to protect himself from the vicious attack of an unleashed Labrador, PUNCHED THE DOG’S OWNER RIGHT IN THE FACE. Seriously. He said he was acting in self-defense. So he punched attorney Tim Kelly in the friggin face. It is unclear at this point what, if any, criminal charges will be filed. This article was originally published on Colony Jax. |
February 12, 2008, 12:14 am
Re: Business as Usual
TITLE 18--CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
PART I--CRIMES
CHAPTER 96--RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS
Sec. 1961. Definitions
As used in this chapter--
(1) ``racketeering activity'' means (A) any act or threat
involving murder, kidnapping, gambling, arson, robbery, bribery,
extortion, dealing in obscene matter, or dealing in a controlled
substance or listed chemical (as defined in section 102 of the
Controlled Substances Act), which is chargeable under State law and
punishable by imprisonment for more than one year; (B) any act which
is indictable under any of the following provisions of title 18,
United States Code: Section 201 (relating to bribery), section 224
(relating to sports bribery), sections 471, 472, and 473 (relating
to counterfeiting), section 659 (relating to theft from interstate
shipment) if the act indictable under section 659 is felonious,
section 664 (relating to embezzlement from pension and welfare
funds), sections 891-894 (relating to extortionate credit
transactions), section 1029 (relating to fraud and related activity
in connection with access devices), section 1084 (relating to the
transmission of gambling information), section 1341 (relating to
mail fraud), section 1343 (relating to wire fraud), section 1344
(relating to financial institution fraud), sections 1461-1465
(relating to obscene matter), section 1503 (relating to obstruction
of justice), section 1510 (relating to obstruction of criminal
investigations), section 1511 (relating to the obstruction of State
or local law enforcement), section 1512 (relating to tampering with
a witness, victim, or an informant), section 1513 (relating to
retaliating against a witness, victim, or an informant), section
1951 (relating to interference with commerce, robbery, or
extortion), section 1952 (relating to racketeering), section 1953
(relating to interstate transportation of wagering paraphernalia),
section 1954 (relating to unlawful welfare fund payments), section
1955 (relating to the prohibition of illegal gambling businesses),
section 1956 (relating to the laundering of monetary instruments),
section 1957 (relating to engaging in monetary transactions in
property derived from specified unlawful activity), section 1958
(relating to use of interstate commerce facilities in the commission
of murder-for-hire), sections 2251, 2251A, 2252, and 2258 (relating
to sexual exploitation of children), sections 2312 and 2313
(relating to interstate transportation of stolen motor vehicles),
sections 2314 and 2315 (relating to interstate transportation of
stolen property), section 2321 (relating to trafficking in certain
motor vehicles or motor vehicle parts), sections 2341-2346 (relating
to trafficking in contraband cigarettes), sections 2421-24 (relating
to white slave traffic), (C) any act which is indictable under title
29, United States Code, section 186 (dealing with restrictions on
payments and loans to labor organizations) or section 501(c)
(relating to embezzlement from union funds), (D) any offense
involving fraud connected with a case under title 11 (except a case
under section 157 of that \1\ title), fraud in the sale of
securities, or the felonious manufacture, importation, receiving,
concealment, buying, selling, or otherwise dealing in a controlled
substance or listed chemical (as defined in section 102 of the
Controlled Substances Act), punishable under any law of the United
States, or (E) any act which is indictable under the Currency and
Foreign Transactions Reporting Act.
Sounds like some of this statute might be applicable to the conduct of some members of the current administration of the COJ. Maybe the toothless Harry Shorestein could look into it over drinks with the Mayor.
What are the benefits of having a MetroJacksonville.com account?
- Share your opinion by posting comments on stories that interest you.
- Stay up to date on all of the latest issues affecting your neighborhood.
- Create a network of friends working towards a better Jacksonville.
>> Register now <<