| Rail on a Budget: Austin's MetroRail |
|
|
| Tuesday, 25 September 2007 | |
|
"Austin's MetroRail is one of the most financially efficient systems in the country because it's already paid and it runs on existing track. Other cities that build from scratch pay much more, which is generally done with bonds or taxes." - Misty Whited, Capital Metro spokesman. This is a plan Jacksonville should seriously consider locally as an alternative to the current BRT proposal. Capital MetroRail is a planned 32 mile regional rail transit option for Austin, Texas under the authority of Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority. The project is underway and scheduled for completion in 2008. The system — which will be built on pre-existing freight rail lines — will serve Downtown Austin, East Austin, Northwest Austin and Leander in the first phase. Capital MetroRail's DMU "urban commuter rail" system is an affordable alternative for a traditional light rail plan that was rejected by Austin voters back in 2000.
Estimated to cost $112 million or $3.5 million / mile, the entire project is funded from an existing one cent sales tax that Capital Metro reaps from the region it serves, government grants and rider fares.
Also included in the price is $32.3 million for six self-propelled diesel-electric rail cars from Swiss rail manufacturer Stadler. Each car will have room for more than 200 passengers (with 108 seated) and will feature bicycle and luggage racks, high-back seats, and free WiFi. The cars exceed both U.S. and European safety standards.
Although the cars are described as "low floor", they could more accurately be described as "medium-floor", since floor height is about about 2 feet, or more than 200 mm, higher than the standard 350 mm (about 14 inches) for lowfloor light rail cars, but lower than the high-platform systems used in heavier rapid transit systems. Each car will provide level boarding at medium-high platforms, similar to those used on New Jersey Transit's River Line between Camden and Trenton, and on Ottawa's O-Train. In effect, Capital MetroRail will quite resemble a Schnellbahn ("fast-train") service widespread in Europe, connecting exurbs and suburbs to central cities.
MetroRail would qualify as a "no-frills" rail system. Station platforms are being developed at grade and the majority of the line is single tracked. Simple at-grade stations eliminate the need for elevators and reduce the amount of concrete and steel needed for their construction. Also, unlike traditional light rail, the diesel-electric articulated cars eliminate the need to electrify the route, thus reducing the overall costs of the system as well.
MetroRail already spurring Transit Oriented Development Like Charlotte's light rail line, Austin's affordable commuter rail system is spurring the construction of several transit oriented developments a year before it becomes operational.
Saltillo Lofts is a mixed-income development within walking distance to commercial corridors, major employment centers, and urban neighborhoods. The transit oriented and pedestrian-friendly nature of the project reduces automobile use/air pollution and creates a vibrant metropolitan atmosphere. Eleven of the development's 29 units are priced for residents making 80% of Austin's median family income. This development resuscitated an area of town that was previously considered undesirable, and created housing for an often overlooked group of homebuyers who don't want to live in a suburban area yet can't quite afford central city prices. This mixed-use development is the first of 675 units to rise around a MetroRail stop that was once the location of a railyard and warehouse district. For more information on the Saltillo TOD District: http://www.austinenergy.com/
Crestview Station is another TOD under development along the MetroRail line. This $100 million, 73 acre development will include 150,000 square feet of retail/office space, 600 apartments/condominiums and 500 "row-house" style homes. Currently, the developers (Trammell Crow) are in the process of environmental remediation, since the site was the home of Huntsman Chemical's processing manufacturing facility. For more information on Crestview Station:
Additional Transit Oriented Development Projects Even the suburbs are getting in on the TOD action. Leander, the community located at the terminus point, is in the process of approving a mix of TOD's that will house a population of 30,000, potentially creating a tax base of $2 billion.
New projects for Lakeline rail stop - 7/7/2007 (Leander) - Capital Metro has selected Pacific Summit Partners to develop the rail stop at Lakeline, the second on the line heading south from Leander. Pacific Summit will develop the 20-acre station in addition to its plans for a mixed-use development on 326 acres near U.S. 183 and RM 620. The $400 million project, called Lakeline Station, was announced last year and is expected to include up to 2,700 homes of 12 different types, 150,000 square feet of retail, parks and a proposed school site. In addition, Pacific Summit Partners will develop another 178 acres adjacent to Lakeline Station called Northwood at Lakeline. Northwood will have 1,000 residential units, including condominiums and single-family homes and about five acres of retail. Also being developed is Direct Development's nearby The Shops at Walden Park, which will include 650,000 square feet of retail on 60 acres near RM 620 and U.S. 183. The project will include the redevelopment of the old North Fork center along the frontage of U.S. 183. Other plans for the Lakeline area include a Simmons Vedder project, The Crossing at Lakeline, which will include about 800 apartments, ranging from moderately priced to luxury units and two three-story office buildings. The 1.5 million-square-foot project is on 63 acres adjacent to the rail stop. Simmons Vedder broke ground last week on the office portion of the Lakeline project, which is expected to open in July 2008. The company will break ground on the apartments early next year.
(Leander) - Developers are beginning to announce significant transit-oriented projects near the proposed rail stop in Leander. Bob Wunsch, chief executive officer of Waterstone Development, said that he plans to turn two tracts totaling 240 acres into mixed-use projects that will include single-family homes, multifamily units, a hotel, retail and restaurants. The site is where U.S. 183 and the 183-A toll road converge. Wunsch's projects are two of several in the works for a 2,300-acre transit-oriented site in Leander. They also represent a substantial bet that the new rail line will be a powerful magnet for residential and commercial development. In a related project, the Leander Transit Development LLC recently landed a Capital Metro contract to develop the 14 acres surrounding the first rail stop on the line and secured another contiguous 150 acres for a mixed-use development, the Leander Transit Village. Also in the works is the nearby Villages of Messina. The W.Y. Atlantis project, a 342-acre mixed-use development, will have 750 homes priced from the mid-$200,000s to the upper $600,000s. The project will also have 90 acres of retail and office space, as well as multifamily units. In the new Wunsch project, ground will be broken in September on 150 single-family homes to be built by the Joseph Rutledge Co. Inc., with prices expected to be from $180,000 to $260,000. The plans also include up to 1,200 apartments, 500,000 square feet of retail and a 22-acre church site. Up to 400,000 square feet of office space also is designated for the project. http://recenter.tamu.edu/mnews/mnsearch.asp?AID=3&TID=16 To learn more about the planning of TODs in Austin (PDF)
Transit Adjacent Development Downtown line in Summer 2006.
Downtown line in 2008.
The Downtown line will terminate at the Austin Convention Center and adjacent Marriott hotel. From this point, riders will be able to transfer over to a network of express buses and free trolleys to access the entire downtown corridor.
What can Jacksonville take from this? The planning of Capital MetroRail provides Jacksonville with a real life example of a "no-frills" start up rail system that serves as a hybrid between traditional commuter and light rail systems for a fraction of the costs. |

September 25, 2007, 9:28 am
Pay now or Pay later
Great points on the Austin system. It really is a modern model for Jacksonville. The only point in the story I would question is, how long will it stay diesel? The pay-off for electric railroads comes with increased traffic. Thus a rail line with high traffic is much more economical under the wire then it is as a diesel operation. As traffic grows, the economics of using diesel falls. (not to mention the dependency on fossil fuels). This is why so many new systems go electric from the start.
Ocklawaha
September 25, 2007, 10:01 am
Re: Rail on a Budget: Austin's MetroRail
The good thing is, they don't have to wait ten years or so to afford to electrify the line from the start or raise taxes. Instead, they'll have a system up and running in less than 5 years after it was approved by voters and when traffic grows to the point where it needs to be electrified, it can be done. San Deigo, Miami and Harrisburg, PA are also either constructing or seriously looking into similar systems.
This is completely different and well below the price of JTA's idea of building bus lanes only to rip them up and install light rail once the bus lanes become too congested.
September 25, 2007, 11:04 am
Re: Rail on a Budget: Austin's MetroRail
Can JTA PLEASE look at this?
September 25, 2007, 11:43 am
Re: Rail on a Budget: Austin's MetroRail
I thought the Head of JTA met with you guys. What did he have to say? Can we get a town hall set up to try to get some community support for this issue?
September 25, 2007, 11:46 am
Re: Rail on a Budget: Austin's MetroRail
He said they are going to do a study...
September 25, 2007, 11:57 am
Re: Rail on a Budget: Austin's MetroRail
Anybody want a friendly wager that this "study" comes back to prove the JTA is right about BRT (being the smart alternative) and Rail the (super costly) wrong answer? I'll bet any of you. These guys can "MAKE" the numbers say whatever they want them to say...
Ocklawaha
September 25, 2007, 12:04 pm
Re: Rail on a Budget: Austin's MetroRail
I predict JTA will push forward with their misguided BRT approach (which no one wants and no one but the indigent will use) and it will then inevitably fail. JTA will then say "see Jax just isnt ready for mass transit" and will return to building more roads to nowhere in crooked deals with big property owners (see also Gate and the Mayor).
September 25, 2007, 12:15 pm
Re: Rail on a Budget: Austin's MetroRail
The funny thing is that the BJP does not specifically state that the $100 million set aside for rapid transit right of way, must go towards BUS rapid transit or that JTA must manage that money. When the BJP passed, BRT had not been selected as the technology for Jacksonville's rapid transit system. Maybe its time to pull the rug from under these guys?
The goals of The Better Jacksonville Plan, i.e., growth management, improving and constructing roads, environmental protection and preservation and targeted economic development, and providing public facilities shall be accomplished by the acquisition, construction and development of the following projects, listed with their approximate costs:
(a) Roads/infrastructure/transportation. A $1,500,000,000 Work Program with $750,000,000 funded from the restructuring of existing JTA and City sources, and the remaining $750,000,000 funded from The Better Jacksonville 1/2 Cent Sales Surtax. The Work Program includes new, expanded and widened roads; interchanges, overpasses and intersection improvements; and also includes:
(1) Road resurfacing . . . $105,000,000
(2) Drainage . . . 70,000,000
(3) Sidewalks/bike paths . . . 20,000,000
(4) Landscaping/tree planting along road improvement projects . . . 18,000,000
(5) Safety grade crossings . . . 25,000,000
(6) Rapid Transit right-of-way acquisition . . . 100,000,000
September 25, 2007, 12:40 pm
Re: Rail on a Budget: Austin's MetroRail
Give that money to JTA and watch the BRT become BUILD ROADS TODAY!
Ocklawaha
September 25, 2007, 7:10 pm
Re: Rail on a Budget: Austin's MetroRail
Has anyone sent the JTA the book Suburban Nation? It epitomizes Jacksonville and it's administration.
September 26, 2007, 12:26 am
Re: Rail on a Budget: Austin's MetroRail
I dont know what the debate is all about. As we all know, buses are the future of mass transit. People prefer riding on them, they are attractive and non-polluting and they really fit into the historic neighborhoods. This is why cities all across America are flocking to Bus Rapid Transit.
September 26, 2007, 4:27 pm
Re: Rail on a Budget: Austin's MetroRail
Is that a human arm hanging off the front of the train? If that is all it costs I say go for it because gas costs an arm AND a leg!
September 26, 2007, 7:43 pm
Re: Rail on a Budget: Austin's MetroRail
Kudos MetroJacksonville for the awesome artical. I live in Austin and haven't see this much info in a single place. Thanks for putting that together. And okay, I'll bite, but not on the arm rather Suburban Nation--what's that all about?
September 29, 2007, 3:09 pm
Re: Rail on a Budget: Austin's MetroRail
in the case of jacksonville the proposed bus rapid transit system should be built with 100% BUSES ONLY BUS LANES!!!can commuter/regional rail service really fit the needs of the jacksonville/duval metro region since it MUST SERVE all points of the jacksonville/duval metro region?!the same goes for the proposed bus rapid transit project.
September 29, 2007, 4:30 pm
Re: Rail on a Budget: Austin's MetroRail
At what cost? $750 million? $1 billion?... Ripping up downtown and demolishing restored buildings in the process? How about the route along I-95 that does not go where residents live and work? Why invest in bus rapid transit that does not go where transit riders want to go when we already have city owned right-of-way in the same area that does just that?
There's nothing wrong with the concept of BRT, but Jax's plan leaves a lot to be desired, route planning wise and cost wise. BRT should NEVER cost more than rail.
No transit system MUST SERVE all points of a metropolitan region. Even New York's does not do this and never will or should it. Transit should serve in areas of highest congestion, major local destinations and areas of highest potential transit ridership. We also should not believe that a system should consist of one form of transit. Different corridors have different needs. Some are better served by rail and some by bus. The best transit system is one that realizes this and integrates the techologies instead of one that goes by the "one size fits all mentality."
What are the benefits of having a MetroJacksonville.com account?
- Share your opinion by posting comments on stories that interest you.
- Stay up to date on all of the latest issues affecting your neighborhood.
- Create a network of friends working towards a better Jacksonville.
>> Register now <<