Thursday, November 20thAdvertising  |  About Us  |  Contact Us
What do we stand for? Print E-mail
Sunday, 10 June 2007

Follow and endorse these principles, then watch urban Jacksonville bloom.

WHAT DO WE STAND FOR? 

The Congress for the New Urbanism

CNU members ratified the Charter of the New Urbanism at CNU's fourth annual Congress in 1996. Applying valuable lessons from the past to the modern world, it outlines principles for building better communities, from the scale of the region down to the block.

We view disinvestment in central cities, the spread of placeless sprawl, increasing separation by race and income, environmental deterioration, loss of agricultural lands and wilderness, and the erosion of society's built heritage as one interrelated community-building challenge.

We stand for the restoration of existing urban centers and towns within coherent metropolitan regions, the reconfiguration of sprawling suburbs into communities of real neighborhoods and diverse districts, the conservation of natural environments, and the preservation of our built legacy.

We recognize that physical solutions by themselves will not solve social and economic problems, but neither can economic vitality, community stability, and environmental health be sustained without a coherent and supportive physical framework.

We advocate the restructuring of public policy and development practices to support the following principles: neighborhoods should be diverse in use and population; communities should be designed for the pedestrian and transit as well as the car; cities and towns should be shaped by physically defined and universally accessible public spaces and community institutions; urban places should be framed by architecture and landscape design that celebrate local history, climate, ecology, and building practice.

We represent a broad-based citizenry, composed of public and private sector leaders, community activists, and multidisciplinary professionals. We are committed to reestablishing the relationship between the art of building and the making of community, through citizen-based participatory planning and design.

We dedicate ourselves to reclaiming our homes, blocks, streets, parks, neighborhoods, districts, towns, cities, regions, and environment.

We assert the following principles to guide public policy, development practice, urban planning, and design:

 

The region: Metropolis, city, and town

1. Metropolitan regions are finite places with geographic boundaries derived from topography, watersheds, coastlines, farmlands, regional parks, and river basins. The metropolis is made of multiple centers that are cities, towns, and villages, each with its own identifiable center and edges.

2. The metropolitan region is a fundamental economic unit of the contemporary world. Governmental cooperation, public policy, physical planning, and economic strategies must reflect this new reality.

3. The metropolis has a necessary and fragile relationship to its agrarian hinterland and natural landscapes. The relationship is environmental, economic, and cultural. Farmland and nature are as important to the metropolis as the garden is to the house.

4. Development patterns should not blur or eradicate the edges of the metropolis. Infill development within existing urban areas conserves environmental resources, economic investment, and social fabric, while reclaiming marginal and abandoned areas. Metropolitan regions should develop strategies to encourage such infill development over peripheral expansion.

5. Where appropriate, new development contiguous to urban boundaries should be organized as neighborhoods and districts, and be integrated with the existing urban pattern. Noncontiguous development should be organized as towns and villages with their own urban edges, and planned for a jobs/housing balance, not as bedroom suburbs.

6. The development and redevelopment of towns and cities should respect historical patterns, precedents, and boundaries.

7. Cities and towns should bring into proximity a broad spectrum of public and private uses to support a regional economy that benefits people of all incomes. Affordable housing should be distributed throughout the region to match job opportunities and to avoid concentrations of poverty.

8. The physical organization of the region should be supported by a framework of transportation alternatives. Transit, pedestrian, and bicycle systems should maximize access and mobility throughout the region while reducing dependence upon the automobile.

9. Revenues and resources can be shared more cooperatively among the municipalities and centers within regions to avoid destructive competition for tax base and to promote rational coordination of transportation, recreation, public services, housing, and community institutions.

 

The neighborhood, the district, and the corridor

1. The neighborhood, the district, and the corridor are the essential elements of development and redevelopment in the metropolis. They form identifiable areas that encourage citizens to take responsibility for their maintenance and evolution.

2. Neighborhoods should be compact, pedestrian-friendly, and mixed-use. Districts generally emphasize a special single use, and should follow the principles of neighborhood design when possible. Corridors are regional connectors of neighborhoods and districts; they range from boulevards and rail lines to rivers and parkways.

3. Many activities of daily living should occur within walking distance, allowing independence to those who do not drive, especially the elderly and the young. Interconnected networks of streets should be designed to encourage walking, reduce the number and length of automobile trips, and conserve energy.

4. Within neighborhoods, a broad range of housing types and price levels can bring people of diverse ages, races, and incomes into daily interaction, strengthening the personal and civic bonds essential to an authentic community.

5. Transit corridors, when properly planned and coordinated, can help organize metropolitan structure and revitalize urban centers. In contrast, highway corridors should not displace investment from existing centers.

6. Appropriate building densities and land uses should be within walking distance of transit stops, permitting public transit to become a viable alternative to the automobile.

7. Concentrations of civic, institutional, and commercial activity should be embedded in neighborhoods and districts, not isolated in remote, single-use complexes. Schools should be sized and located to enable children to walk or bicycle to them.

8. The economic health and harmonious evolution of neighborhoods, districts, and corridors can be improved through graphic urban design codes that serve as predictable guides for change.

9. A range of parks, from tot-lots and village greens to ballfields and community gardens, should be distributed within neighborhoods. Conservation areas and open lands should be used to define and connect different neighborhoods and districts.

 

The block, the street, and the building

1. A primary task of all urban architecture and landscape design is the physical definition of streets and public spaces as places of shared use.

2. Individual architectural projects should be seamlessly linked to their surroundings. This issue transcends style.

3. The revitalization of urban places depends on safety and security. The design of streets and buildings should reinforce safe environments, but not at the expense of accessibility and openness.

4. In the contemporary metropolis, development must adequately accommodate automobiles. It should do so in ways that respect the pedestrian and the form of public space.

5. Streets and squares should be safe, comfortable, and interesting to the pedestrian. Properly configured, they encourage walking and enable neighbors to know each other and protect their communities.

6. Architecture and landscape design should grow from local climate, topography, history, and building practice.

7. Civic buildings and public gathering places require important sites to reinforce community identity and the culture of democracy. They deserve distinctive form, because their role is different from that of other buildings and places that constitute the fabric of the city.

8. All buildings should provide their inhabitants with a clear sense of location, weather and time. Natural methods of heating and cooling can be more resource-efficient than mechanical systems.

9. Preservation and renewal of historic buildings, districts, and landscapes affirm the continuity and evolution of urban society.

Text originally posted at: http://www.cnu.org/charter

 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Latest Features

Latest News

  • Noisy birth of the Buckman Bridge
    For almost four decades, the Buckman Bridge has been both a blessing and a curse for commuters. But there are some who remember when a trip across the St. Johns...
  • Hanjin Deal Done
    An International company has sealed a deal with Jaxport today. The board of directors at Hanjin approved the terms and conditions of the deal at their quarterly meeting today.
  • New name looming for state's second largest community college
    Florida Community College at Jacksonville President Dr. Steve Wallace is a busy guy this week. Monday, he got on a plane headed for Austin, Texas where he?s making a pit...
  • Downtown transit project
    A vision for the future of Downtown transit including city buses feeding trolley routes to reduce congestion on city streets has moved another step closer to reality.
  • $4 million jolt for city's Safe Streets
    As a fresh flow of dollars is infused into the Jacksonville Journey, police hope a flood of officers can repeat the success of a spring anti-crime initiative described as a...
  • Leaders gather to support St. Johns cleanup plan
    Gov. Charlie Crist and other major players in the health of the St. Johns River gathered at its banks Monday to promote a sweeping plan to improve its health. But...
  • Jaxport expects Hanjin contract by Nov. 11
    The Jacksonville Port Authority expects to have completed a contract by Nov. 11 with Hanjin Shipping Co. Ltd. for the South Korean company?s operations of a terminal at Dames Point.
  • Amtrak weighs return of direct route to Miami
    It's a little early to get nostalgic for 2001, but Amtrak officials have begun talking about turning back the clock and taking a second crack at a passenger train route...
  • Sheriff's Springfield walk shows decade of progress
    Jacksonville Sheriff John Rutherford joined about 20 officers Tuesday on a crime-prevention stroll through Springfield, but they didn't spot any suspicious characters.

Related Articles

Ronco Group Renderings
The Ronco Group will be the lastest company to locate to the neighborhood formerly known as LaVilla.  
Downtown Living Tour 2006
Take a tour of Downtown Jacksonville's living options.   
Downtown Frankenstein! Rewind to Blight
Last Episode? Cars. This one? Blight. Negroes. Civil Rights Violence. Racist Swine. Clever Engineers.In the sad and sadly predictable...
>> 6 Comments
Amanda
June 11, 2007, 1:17 pm
The new urbanist stigma

The thing I hate about new urbanism the most is that is has whole heartedly contributed to the continuation of the ex-urban subdivision.  Developers merely need to add a "town center" with space for a few retail shops and planning commissions are happy to rubber stamp the development.   New urbanism is a great idea but it can only flourish if zero-growth or halted-growth policies are enacted.  

Granted a new urbanist development is better than say the gated golf course communities that sprouted all over Florida in the 80s and early 90s.  
mark5
June 11, 2007, 1:46 pm


Bring JAX Beer Back!!!!
zoo
June 11, 2007, 2:32 pm


Love that Jax beer sign!!!

Ditto, Amanda, re: "town centers". I am so sick of these, and the unending use of the phrase by the same old suburban developers re-packaging their product. This is not true "new urbanism", but at least its better than the stucco-yucco damage they've been doing to Florida's real estate market for decades.

The real problem is with city departments that keep approving them. if it looks like a suburban tract development, is laid out like a suburban tract development (albeit with a central "town" instead of the 4-corner big box nightmare nearby), it is still a suburban tract development!
margaret koscielny
June 12, 2007, 2:35 pm


The disconnect between the photographs of old Jacksonville (which I remember it looking like, although I am not so "old") and the comments, here, point out how generational differences affect discussions like this one.

Our city went from a comfortable 150,000 to 350,000-750,000 to over 1,000,000 within the last 50-60 years. It spread out from the city limits which ended in the middle of the Main Street Bridge(!), to accomodate growth in population. Urbanization, with an emphasis on the centeredness of a city changed its complextion, and the center died, except for certain traditional institutions, such as city government and courts, which remained.

Transportation choices reflected lack of imagination in projecting a wholistic approach to the idea of a city: the center and the outlying areas, operating as a interactive, organic entity. Jacksonville lost out because of its shortsightedness, smallmindedness, or, lack of futuristic imagination in regard to mass transit, light rail, green islands, etc. Now, we pay the price, and the price is going up in energy costs, congestion and pollution. Older sections of town, close to town, have found their own "centers," working efficiently to serve the neighborhoods in the way the old city center once did.

The only way to get the old center revived (centered around Hemming Park) is to increase housing for all economic levels with services that are needed by this "center" neighborhood. In other words, Jacksonville City Center should be seen as another neighborhood, instead of an all-purpose center for the entire city. That model doesn't work any more for a place as large as Jacksonville.

Oh, and do I miss the old Jacksonville? Yes, in many ways.
cinch2win
June 13, 2007, 5:54 am
We stand for

Truth, Justice and the American Way.....
Mild Mannered Reporter
June 17, 2007, 1:10 am
Re: We Stand For

New Urbanism could definitely improve the quality of life on the First Coast. I would rather see more urban infill first, but real estate costs and buyer preferences make more suburban development inevitable. Communities with new urbanism features are certainly a great improvement over the typical sprawl developments.
http://jacksonvillechristiannews.blogspot.com/2007/06/new-urbanism-can-help-to-create-family.html
Welcome Guest. You must be logged in to comment on this story.

What are the benefits of having a MetroJacksonville.com account?
  • Share your opinion by posting comments on stories that interest you.
  • Stay up to date on all of the latest issues affecting your neighborhood.
  • Create a network of friends working towards a better Jacksonville.
>> Register now <<
Already have an account? Login now to comment.