Must Read from around the web
New JTA Bus Stops signs
jaxdailyrecord.com - New JTA bus signs, like this one on Newnan Street across from the Yates Building, have started popping up at stations Downtown.
Panera Bread in San Marco to close
jacksonville.bizjournals.com - The Panera Bread restaurant in San Marco is scheduled to close in December.
Florida's 11% unemployment is a 24-year high
jacksonville.bizjournals.com - Florida's unemployment rate hit 11 percent in September, a level not seen since October 1975. The state's unemployment rate was up 0.2 percentage points from August, according to the Florida…
Future of Sunset Limited train service through Jacksonville unclear
jacksonville.com - Until 2005 the Sunset Limited ran from Orlando to Los Angeles going through Jacksonville. But service from here died when Hurricane Katrina decimated the Gulf Coast in August 2005 and…
City Council Amends Sign Ordinance to Allow for Bus Shelters
urbanjacksonville.info - This morning on First Coast Connect at 9:00 we'll be discussing the City Council's decision to allow the JTA to hire an independent company to build dozens of bus shelters…
Florida East Coast will roll out AMTRAK in 2.6 Years
jacksonvilletransit.blogspot.com - 1968, it was an overcast afternoon when train number 2, The Florida East Coast Local to Jacksonville, whistled through St. Augustine, for the last time.
Urban Jacksonville Wins Best Jacksonville Blog
urbanjacksonville.info - For the third year in a row Urban Jacksonville was nominated by Folio readers as Best Blog in Jacksonville. It's an awesome honor and I'd like to thank everyone who…
Placement of bus shelters stirs debate through Jacksonville
jacksonville.com - In the half-shade of a droopy palm tree, Kise Jones did his best to stay comfortable and patient as he waited for the bus Sunday afternoon in downtown Jacksonville.
Urban Jacksonville Weekly #35
urbanjacksonville.info - Taverna in San Marco and Farm to Table Tour
JEDC to amend Downtown historic restoration agreement, restart project
jaxdailyrecord.com - An agreement approved by City Council five years ago to grant $400,000 from the Historic Preservation Trust Fund to rehabilitate a building on West Adams Street got some new life…
downtownparks
January 30, 2009, 08:07:23 AMSeems very reasonable to me. My only reservation would be the fishing industry. Will there still be room for it in Mayport?
BridgeTroll
January 30, 2009, 09:42:42 AMWhat a huge improvement to what is now called "historic".
mrmakersmark
January 30, 2009, 09:51:03 AMRead all of the concessions that JaxPort put in the presentation and you will see that the fishing industry is WELL taken care of. The 'Village' is also well taken care of for a museum, public space, and continued operations of the ferry for the next 10 years. With the way that Orsini spoke with his negative attitude, I thought that the ferry was going away in 2010.
alta
January 30, 2009, 10:18:14 AMFrom everything I have read the JaxPort cruise terminal is well designed and has incorporated the concerns of Mayport. This would be a great asset for Jacksonville and draw a lot of people to Mayport. I guess the alternative is to let Mayport die a slow death.
Dapperdan
January 30, 2009, 10:47:24 AMWake up May Port. This will be great for your area. Last time I was there, the roads and everything looked decrepit. Sounds like a few people are trying to block something that will benefit a great many more.
Joe
January 30, 2009, 11:01:13 AMLooks like a great plan overall, and the concessions are amazing considering the city probaby doesn't even need the neighborhood's approval for this rezoning to be legal.
The only thing that raised my eyebrow was the tiny surface parking lot across the street for no particular reason. I hardly think 20 parking spots are crucial for the project, compared to a commercial use that could actually recreate this "historic" character that everyone keeps claiming they want to respect.
thelakelander
January 30, 2009, 11:09:58 AMThat tiny lot also caught my attention. Everything directly across the street should be envisioned to become complementing commercial/mixed-use development.
I also wonder what the plan is to accommodate the existing shrimp boat docks. Other than that, the plan isn't a bad one. From a site layout standpoint, this thing could have been much worse. It does appear that the port authority has really tried to work with the Mayport community.
Ocklawaha
January 30, 2009, 11:19:44 AMPutting the terminal in Mayport bodes well for promotion of "The Buccaneer Trail", our historic pirate coast highway A-1-A.
Thalassoharpaxomania = robber, sea, obsession, ("Pirate Mania.") Just one more thing the city failed to jump on in the midst of all of the recent movies. Shouldn't we have hosted the openings? Shouldn't we have staged the invasion? Shouldn't we take this for our own?
The pirates are still around. Don't believe it? Try parking your car on Mayport Road overnight, hee hee. But hey, the village wants to keep it's historic "charm". My concern is cynical because if they really cared about Mayport, someone would have got out a paint brush, trash can, bucket, and a mop, a long, long time ago.
The new terminal opens up a splended opportunity for BEACH-RAIL, streetcar. With venues on the South at Ponte Vedra-Sawgrass, attractions all along the Coast, Jax Beach-Atlantic Beach, and a cruise port on the north, this might be the most viable route in the county. Thought should be given by our port authority on future private right-of-way over the marsh, along the road to string the beach pearls together.
OCKLAWAHA
downtownjag
January 30, 2009, 11:26:34 AMMayport is full of a bunch of people who had been begging for someone to come in and redevelop the village. They thought they were going to get condo's and restaurants which would raise their property values so they could cash in. Be careful what you wish for!
DevilsAdvocate
January 30, 2009, 12:13:33 PMBetter idea: Close Mayport NS, put the cruise terminal there, reconnect Mayport Village with the rest of the beaches and watch some great developments pop up in a huge piece of river/beachfront property that's currently not on the tax rolls.
BridgeTroll
January 30, 2009, 12:28:15 PMWhy would you close a perfectly good Naval Station? For taxes? Nonsense... they cannot sell the condos overlooking the river downtown.
Ocklawaha
January 30, 2009, 12:42:00 PMOCKLAWAHA
tufsu1
January 30, 2009, 01:27:30 PMJoe
January 30, 2009, 01:55:50 PMNo way.
You can't replicate the economic impact of the navy base, period. The extra taxes on private property (which would take 20 years to build out) simply cannot compare to the money that the navy injects into our economy. Especially with a new nuclear carrier supposedly due.
Even if Jax wanted to close a base, NAS would be a better choice than Mayport at this point (not that I'd want either to go).
Ocklawaha
January 30, 2009, 02:01:47 PMYes, I CAN see it. The problem with Tampa's Line is that it doesn't reach the people. How many hotels are there on the Tampa Line and how many are along our beaches? I think we win that one with ease. After that, it's just a matter of packaging the cruise with hotel accomodations at our beaches. Something that could be done by the CofC and visitors bureau's.
Once Tampa breaks down and gets that streetcar up to the Airport, it's going to light that city up like PORTLAND experienced. I'll wager the investment tops a BILLION DOLLARS within a year of opening. Much of the new investment in Tampa will be hotel room stock and restaurants.
While our beaches are not in the same league as cities as Tampa, they certainly have as much (I'd say a lot more) visitors appeal.
The only thing our combined Sawgrass to Mayport strip lacks is a "hook" on the fishing line. Streetcars to our beaches were proposed in the 1920's by commissioner, St. Elmo Acosta. After the car line's in downtown were eaten by General Motors, he then proposed a Trolley Bus on a BRT like express busway. Both times he was ignored. 3 times a charm?
This would build up the beaches, also all along the line stops could be made every half mile at rates so much per mile.
Too bad those who started Jacksonville did not appreciate the beaches as we do now and started Jacksonville at St. Johns Bluff like all other cities on the East and West Coast of Florida have been started, what is within a mile or two of the
ocean. Jacksonville will build with the proper transportation and cheap transportation towards the beaches and in the future and from the beaches back towards Jacksonville.
Jacksonville should at first session of legislature arrange to take over the 100' strip (beach railroad grade) from new limits in southside on beach road to beaches then from Mayport to St. Johns County line as part of Jacksonville. We should do this so that we could give the necessary improvements to the ocean part of Jacksonville, such as paving, beautification and planting trees, right kind of building regulations, do away with mosquito conditions in the marshes in back of the beach, cutting a canal from Florida East Coast Canal to within 5 blocks of the beaches so that excursion steamers could go down the St. Johns River and deliver our people there, thus giving them a plesant boat ride at a small expense also. We could then give the beaches lower electricity and power.
St. Elmo Acosta, from the Jacksonville American, Aug 1, 1931.
OCKLAWAHA
tufsu1
January 30, 2009, 02:16:21 PMwrong again....there are four Tampa hotels directly on the line....with almost 1500 rooms...and if you count hotels within 3 blocks of the streetcar line, the number jumps to 8 hotels with close to 2500 rooms....can we match that?
Also....the streetcar will never be extended to the airport in Tampa....streetcars serve a local area....say up to 5 miles long
Tampa's airport will either be served by the second phase of their light rail plan (of course Phase 1 has to get approved first)....or commuter rail through TBARTA, or maybe someday high speed rail.
Ocklawaha
January 30, 2009, 04:21:30 PMAlso....the streetcar will never be extended to the airport in Tampa....streetcars serve a local area....say up to 5 miles long
Tampa's airport will either be served by the second phase of their light rail plan (of course Phase 1 has to get approved first)....or commuter rail through TBARTA, or maybe someday high speed rail.
Looks like you slipped on your own venom this time. How many of those hotels were in place BEFORE the TECO streetcar line in Tampa? How many more are planned as a result of the new TECO extension? How much is coming to Tampa because of TECO?
ANOTHER $800 Million to $1 Billion dollars!
Please tell me about streetcars and how they can only serve local area's, I'd really like to hear your information. What would prevent a TECO streetcar from going to the Airport?
OCKLAWAHA
tufsu1
January 30, 2009, 05:55:45 PMI didn't slip at all Ock....you said we had more hotels/rooms on the beach than Tampa, and I proved you wrong....but just so you know, only 2 of the Tampa hotels have been built since the streetcar line opened....and they account for less than 500 rooms.
I totally AGREE that streetcars often spur development around it....but its still not a viable transport mode for diatnaces that are longer than about 5 miles....combined with the luggage issues, it seems to me that a streetcar line from hotels in Ponte vedra and Jax Beach to Mayport to primarily serve cruise passengers would not work.
It makes much more sense to work with the hotels to provide shuttle service (as is done in Tampa)....especially if ships will only be in port 1-2 days a week!
Ocklawaha
January 30, 2009, 08:06:33 PMI totally AGREE that streetcars often spur development around it....but its still not a viable transport mode for diatnaces that are longer than about 5 miles....combined with the luggage issues, it seems to me that a streetcar line from hotels in Ponte vedra and Jax Beach to Mayport to primarily serve cruise passengers would not work.
It makes much more sense to work with the hotels to provide shuttle service (as is done in Tampa)....especially if ships will only be in port 1-2 days a week!
My mistake. I counted over 1,000 rooms at Jacksonville Beach but could find nothing with a complete room count. We seem to have more hotels overall but fewer rooms. This begs a completely new question... WHY? What screw up have our Beaches done to knock them so far out of the hotel competition as a Florida resort area. Veru interestomg that we are about 1/3 short of the hotel rooms along TECO and that TECO has so far accounted for about 1/3 of the hotel rooms along that strip in Tampa.
Streetcars are larger, faster and quieter then most buses, and I have ridden on several systems where there are luggage and bike racks in one end of the cars. Certainly something like this could be done if we had a beachfront car line.
I still think the novelty of riding the cars to the ship along with the many cruise packages which will come BEACH SIDE with a Port location change, would be great. With little effort our beaches would finally start looking more like some of the resorts to the North or South. It is going to happen even withourt a streetcar line, but as far as density, corridor, purpose, venues etc... I can think of dozens of reasons we should secure right-of-way for future transit to the Mayport Terminal.
As far as being a short haul vehicle, this doesn't have to be the case. With the systems that survived the streetcar wipeout of the 1930's-80's, often offer many more miles and routes. Also keep in mind that a streetcar is simply a slightly smaller version of LRT. Those lines are getting more blured by the day, and perahps it's time to take the whole industry up a notch with these LONG NARROW cities spread along our coast. Just as I would say Jacksonville Beaches are a natural for streetcar, I'd also give the same consideration to Daytona Beaches, Cocoa, etc... Though I would HOPE that we are finally first in something besides another failure.
Good discussion, I like this.
OCKLAWAHA
tufsu1
January 30, 2009, 08:10:59 PMThe main reason Tampa has more rooms is the convention center....the Marriott Waterside has 750+ rooms and the new Embassy Suites has about 350....both across the street from the center and the TECO streetcar line.
Ocklawaha
January 30, 2009, 08:15:55 PMYeah guess my Florida is changing pretty fast, Tampa is a long, long, way from Bogota!
FYI, the 501 Queen Streetcar line of Toronto is a bit over 15 miles long, imagine this stretched along one of Florida's long-narrow beach city clusters. Paradise lost?
OCKLAWAHA
ProjectMaximus
January 30, 2009, 09:31:09 PMaww man. I was just gettin my popcorn ready for the big fight!!
Looks like you guys worked things out. Hugs all around. I love the streetcar idea, too. Just doesn't seem feasible in the near future. Certainly not until there is more to serve than just the cruise ship passenger demographic. But way to always think big, Ock, and keep reminding us of what the ultimate aspirations should be, and what we've had in the past.
blizz01
January 30, 2009, 09:52:00 PMWhy did Celebrity pull out?
Ocklawaha
January 31, 2009, 11:48:48 AMThank's for the good words here, I think we are all on the same page as far as pushing our city as far as it can go.
Beaches streetcar could even go with the new technology called ULTRA-LIGHT RAIL, a rail system to be sure but much lower in overall costs. BTW, O&M on electrics is cheaper then for diesel, bus or rail.
NEW ULRT vehicle roll out.
If ULRT or Streetcar were installed, I think you'd get the following:
Families out for a day trip to the Mayport Seafood places
Coast Guardsmen
Rail Buffs
History Buffs
Fishermen
Port Employees
Cruise Passengers
Navy personel
Family Excursions
Shoppers
Trolley-Ferry Packages... (and what if the ULRT crossed the ferry? It's easy with rail...Hugenot Park anyone?)
Remember that as these Terminals are developed, Mayport is going to become more and more of an attraction for everyone.
As for the longer stretch it goes something like.
Mayport - attractor
Mayport NS - producer
Atlantic Beach - residential
Downtown Atlantic Beach/Neptune Beach - attractor
North hotel Strip - residential
North businesses - attractors
Jacksonville Beach - residential
Jacksonville Beach - attractor
Sea Walk - attractor
Historical Museum - attractor
South beach Strip - residential
JTB area Shoping - attractor
Ponte Vedra - residential
Ponte Vedra - attractor
Sawgrass - attractor + residential
Anyone remember the JTA PCT Trolley experiment this past summer? It blew away the projections and stayed so busy that the beaches are considering going year-round? But it's been proven that the PCT Trolleys do not attract choice riders (riders that would otherwise drive), but rail does. Do the math JAX BEACHES.
OCKLAWAHA
Charles Hunter
January 31, 2009, 10:50:41 PMI think the lot across the street is for vehicles that won't fit in the garage - RVs and the like.
thelakelander
February 09, 2009, 07:40:53 AMBut the Port Authority hasn't finished research or made final decision.
The Jacksonville City Council is expected to pave the way Tuesday for a cruise ship terminal to be built in Mayport.
Opponents of the plan say they were taken by surprise by the council's decision to move forward on a vote. They were hoping that wouldn't happen until the Jacksonville Port Authority finished researching the project's financial feasibility and made a final decision.
Council President Ronnie Fussell decided in early January to postpone voting on the three bills associated with the cruise terminal proposal to give the Port Authority time to weigh in. He told the council's Land Use and Zoning Committee not to vote on the zoning bill.
The JPA board met Jan. 26 and decided to look for a firm to design and build the terminal. However, the board members reserved the right to scrap the project if it cost too much or if they changed their minds.
Fussell said the JPA and Councilman Ray Holt, whose district includes Mayport, indicated they no longer saw need for the council to delay a decision. He and Art Graham, chairman of the Land Use and Zoning Committee, decided the committee would vote.
full article: http://www.jacksonville.com/news/metro/2009-02-09/story/council_ready_to_vote_on_mayport_cruise_terminal
Jason
February 09, 2009, 09:13:54 AMMy guess is that it will pass.
GatorShane
February 09, 2009, 06:56:34 PMLets get this done. The river and all the opportunities that it has to offer( The Navy, the Port, and yes Cruise ships) will be a major economic engine for this region for years to come.
billy
February 23, 2009, 04:26:20 PMIs there an advertised Request For Proposals at this point?
tufsu1
February 23, 2009, 04:41:31 PMno...but it is expected shortly...if they stay on the schedule discussed at their last board meeting
rayna22
April 02, 2009, 07:30:50 PMi personally used to live out at mayport and i think it will be great for the mayport area and the surrounding areas. the fun that could be had and the work that could be done its gona be great.
Ocklawaha
April 03, 2009, 01:20:51 AMNot that I've heard of, though one company did propose a building that is tilted to look like an old washing machine, a giant spare tire lays against one side where the shopping and restaurants would be, and the parking garage looks like a 1957 model Edsel on Concrete Blocks... You know, to keep with the theme of the historic surroundings.
Good God Jacksonville lets GET-R-DONE!
OCKLAWAHA
Charles Hunter
April 03, 2009, 06:36:34 AMJaxPort has withdrawn its efforts to rezone the property and the RFP (or will not issue one) for a Mayport Cruise Terminal for the time being.
fsujax
April 03, 2009, 08:58:36 AMI think "for the time being" is important to note. It will be back.
Ocklawaha
April 03, 2009, 10:31:23 AMNo doubt, there isn't a whole host of alternatives thanks to that lower then the maritime industry wanted JTA bridge (I just couldn't resist that!).
OCKLAWAHA
ChriswUfGator
April 03, 2009, 11:32:30 AMExactly. The way stuff works around here, they're hatching some plot behind the scenes to overrule what the people who actually live and work in that area want.
This will be exactly like the Craig airport extension. Nobody wants it except for some stupid bureaucrat, but still the issue keeps coming up again and again again. Actually Craig is even worse than Mayport with the way they handled it.
They got into litigation over it 10 years ago, and negotiated a settlement where in exchange for the last runway extension the residents approved, they promised to never seek another one. Well 10 years later, they break their own agreement and go right ahead and try and get another extension anyway. It's ridiculous.
Ocklawaha
April 03, 2009, 12:26:09 PM"AHOY MAYPORT! HEAVE TOO AND STAND BY FOR A RAM!"
I just don't see the Mayport thing as some great conspiracy. The village is unkept, in fact it's a total wreck save for a few homeowners who maintain their property. The waterfront is a sea of decay, old rotting docks and piles, and stinking heaps of shell fish guts. Most of the business buildings were empty.
The few historic homes are NOT endangered by the Port, and the only unknown is the little history village which I'm sure could be moved across the street or included in the port as a cool diversion, retail and food mall with a nice museum inside.
JaxPort has been very open with this whole process. The COJ and PORT have asked the Mayport community to help design the terminal, they've offered to include Mayport citizens in the job creation, addressed the environmental concerns, Power concerns, road concerns, parking concerns. They asked the Mayport businesses to come into the new terminal, they offered a boat basin and new docks, they have done everything but move the BOA building to Mayport. Still Mayport has given the City the collective middle finger apparently forgetting they could have opted out of Jacksonville in Consolidation by incorporating their village. Sorry to say, they are now part of the whole of Jacksonville, and the old "Greater Good" argument is VERY applicable to this situation.
Mayport will find that they'd attract a lot more flies with honey then vinegar. Bottom line is the city could use one of two approaches here: The old "Jessie James Method" where they just condemn the farm then blow it up without removing the occupants first, or, The "Kid Glove Method" which is exactly what they've done. Being that they have been stonewalled at every turn, the port and COJ might now be gathering their forces for a full frontal assault on the ramparts (and who could blame them?).... or as they say in the Navy - "STAND BY FOR A RAM!"
OCKLAWAHA
tufsu1
April 03, 2009, 08:49:40 PMsometimes what the people who live/work there want is not what is best for the entire community....its called NIMBY-ism (not in my back yard)....or BANANA (build absolutely nothing anywhere near anything)....which is why government has limited powers to condemn property through eminent domain.
blizz01
April 03, 2009, 09:11:17 PMI think that the majority DO want this, however, there is a vocal minority who do not. Of course, the folks who do don't actually live in Mayport, but.....................
ChriswUfGator
April 05, 2009, 06:05:58 PMsometimes what the people who live/work there want is not what is best for the entire community....its called NIMBY-ism (not in my back yard)....or BANANA (build absolutely nothing anywhere near anything)....which is why government has limited powers to condemn property through eminent domain.
That cuts both ways...
I sure don't see anybody with any of those giant $10 million dollar houses over off Fort Caroline Rd. and Mt. Pleasant offering to park giant cruise ships in their own back yard to obliterate their views, not to mention the thousands of people and horrendous traffic they bring along with them.
No, with few exceptions (more like "none" that I know of) all the people pushing this thing don't live in or have much to do with Mayport. This isn't a simple case of "NIMBY", it's a situation where you've got all these people who have nothing to do with a community saying "Oh yeah...It's goin' in YOUR back yard".
That's not fair.
reednavy
April 05, 2009, 07:15:22 PMWhat isn't fair is giving a historic designation to a place that looks like utter garbage everyday. Most of what is directly across the river from the site is boat marinas and the ferry terminal, the homes are slightly further upriver.
Another thing is that these ships are only in homeport for 2 to 3 days max, from what I've seen, before they go back out. I honestly think it'd be neat to get to see a cruise ship from my deck across the river if I lived there.
This is turning more into a catfight of people wanting to preserve something that is far from historic IMO and those of many others. The only historic thing there is something you can't even get to because it is on NS Mayport property, the lighthouse.
This cruise port is going to play a large part in the continuing growth of Jacksonville as a destination and port city. Miami and Port Everglades(Fort Lauderdale) are out of room and Port Canaveral is coming close and is also starting to charge higher rates. Jax is cheaper and easier to get to for more people who want to take a cruise, that is plain and simple. We have a large SE market to draw from, basically cockblocking some cruise traffic for ports further south, namely Canaveral.
ChriswUfGator
April 05, 2009, 07:26:56 PMAnother thing is that these ships are only in homeport for 2 to 3 days max, from what I've seen, before they go back out. I honestly think it'd be neat to get to see a cruise ship from my deck across the river if I lived there.
This is turning more into a catfight of people wanting to preserve something that is far from historic IMO and those of many others. The only historic thing there is something you can't even get to because it is on NS Mayport property, the lighthouse.
This cruise port is going to play a large part in the continuing growth of Jacksonville as a destination and port city. Miami and Port Everglades(Fort Lauderdale) are out of room and Port Canaveral is coming close and is also starting to charge higher rates. Jax is cheaper and easier to get to for more people who want to take a cruise, that is plain and simple. We have a large SE market to draw from, basically cockblocking some cruise traffic for ports further south, namely Canaveral.
Do you live in Mayport?
Because if not, then your comments and opinions on this subject have just proven my point about how this whole thing is being handled over the objections of the folks who actually live and work there...
You have no more right to say their community looks like garbage and nobody would care if you dumped 3000 people a week through their formerly sleepy town, than they have any right to tell you what kind of grass you can grow in your community.
tufsu1
April 05, 2009, 09:20:31 PMagain, the purpose of eminent domain is to allow government to acquire land at a fair price in order to provide fo something (roads, schools, utilities, etc.) that benefit the community as a whole....in Florida, as elsewhere in the nation, eminent domain can be used for economic development...the Supreme Court affirmed this in the Kelo case a few years ago
In the case of JaxPort, they already own the land (as part of a swap with the City)...and are just seeking the land use approvals to allow the cruise terminal on land that is already zoned for similar uses.
Ocklawaha
April 05, 2009, 11:46:10 PMBecause if not, then your comments and opinions on this subject have just proven my point about how this whole thing is being handled over the objections of the folks who actually live and work there...
You have no more right to say their community looks like garbage and nobody would care if you dumped 3000 people a week through their formerly sleepy town, than they have any right to tell you what kind of grass you can grow in your community.
Uh, maybe not Mayport proper but my zip code is the same! Your statement: "through their formerly sleepy town." says a lot.
"Their" in this case is US! It is OUR SLEEPY TOWN ... AKA: Jacksonville. Mayport is no more a "Town" then Ortega, St. Johns Town Center, or Cecil Field. They are all subject to the will of the greater majority that we call Jacksonville.
Before someone goes off bleeding for "Mayportites," let me remind you that Baldwin, Atlantic, Neptune and Jacksonville Beach all stayed OUT of the Consolidated City of Jacksonville by VOTE! Mayport could have done the same but they didn't have their act together then, and they still don't.
Since Mayport belongs as much to the guy off Lem Turner as it does the guy off A-1-A, I'd say removal of 4-5 blocks of rotting wharves, clapboard shacks and other long dead commercial businesses and replacing them with a clean, dynamic, artsy terminal building, should be the least of their worries.
Electric? The Terminal will guarantee that Mayport has the best service JEA can offer.
Sewer? Again, only the best will do when your going to flush the tanks on a cruise ship.
Trash? You can bet you sweet bippie that Mayport will be kept sparkling clean.
Parking? The JPA won't get the go unless they have a plan in hand to take in EVERY car that visits.
Ferry? This attraction might well be kept on life support until the terminal is finished, and at that time it will once again become a prime attraction.
Retail? Right now the only thing one can buy in Mayport is dead fish. Gee what a curse for them to be able to shop at home.
Restaurants? Where we now sit and eat fish amidst the aroma of dead ones, we'll soon have clean, spotless choices, and mater of fact, the same businesses have been invited to play.
Dockage? We are going to build a complete basin for the shrimpers but they don't want to leave the rotting piers they are so fond of.
Traffic? Hell will freeze over before that link of A-1-A is ever improved, give us the port and watch that road become a model street not unlike Zoo Parkway.
History? Maybe they'll get a historic marker or two...
As it is, the Lighthouse is on the Navy Base and strictly off limits.
Historic Fort Steele is completely gone without a trace.
The Buccaneer Ferry is gone and might as well be sunk.
The Jacksonville and Atlantic Railroad is gone without a trace.
The Jacksonville Mayport and Pablo Beach Railroad is gone without a trace.
Mayport Union Station still stands but only because the City of Jacksonville has created a historic park around it.
The business district is gone, save for a couple of hanger on's.
So what's the beef? I grew up in Ortega and played all through the woods of Yukon (across from NAS JAX MAIN RUNWAY). Today Yukon and Mayport look pretty much like twin neighborhoods. They are both too dead to bury. Sadly, there is no salvation for Yukon - short of a new rail passenger station, nothing could bring it back. I'd give my left nut to see a new Cruise Terminal at Yukon, The Webb's, The Butt's and many other old time families would rejoice... but no cruise ship is going up the Ortega River! Mayport is lucky to have a savior, sadly they want a crucifixion instead.
OCKLAWAHA
reednavy
April 06, 2009, 12:25:17 AMWell said Ock. Mayport is not a seperate community, is part of the C.O.J. and as a citizen, Mayport's future is of insterest to me because this will affect the image of the city quite a bit.
I'm sorry, but they can say all they want, it looks like garbage. Last time I checked trash on the streets and boarded up stores is hardly chic, cosmopolitan, tasteful, or pleasing to the eye.
Mayport had plenty of opportunites to clean their crap up, and it is either sink or swim for them, and has been for years. Apparently, they have been sinking for a while, long before I moved here.
Mayport is Jacksonville, and what these passengers see in Mayport will greatly determine their opinion of the nation's 12th largest city. That opinion can dictate whether they want to explore the city, or jsut chill at The Beaches, rub shoulders with the wealthy in PVB, or drive down to the tourist trap that is St. Augustine.
This terminal is probably the city's largest non-sporting event chance to show what it can do and looks like. I do not want people from Atlanta, Birmingham, or Nashville giving bad opinions about the city I now call home, based on a stupidly designated, historic my azz, fishing "village".
ChriswUfGator
April 06, 2009, 09:42:09 AMWithin 3 months of the Kelo decision, Florida passed Bill 1567, which completely gutted the right of local governments to seize property for economic reasons.
The way things stand now, it has to be a bridge or a highway, or something like that. They can no longer cite "economic development" or "blight" as a valid reason for seizing property.
http://www.northcountrygazette.org/articles/051306FloridaReform.html
Since that time, 40+ out of the 50 states have passed similar legislation. Kelo is no longer relevant.
tufsu1
April 06, 2009, 09:51:19 AMnot quite....Florida already had strong rules on the books regarding eminent domain for economic development....it deals with CRAs and "blighted" areas....the bill you refer to pretty much clarified what was already in statute and rule.
That said, I agree that Kelo doesn't matter in this case....because JaxPort already has the land!
BridgeTroll
April 06, 2009, 10:06:11 AMSince jaxport already owns the land perhaps the question Mayport should answer is...
Do you want a nice cruise ship with tourists and shops and restaraunts or tankers and container ships?
You guys talk it out amongst yourselves and get back to us...
jagsfan32092
April 06, 2009, 10:17:37 AMI believe this is a great thing for the Mayport area. The building and surrounding areas can be kept up in the same theme as Mayport. I go to Mayport about once a month to Safe Harbor. I'm sorry but having a handful of cruise ships will not be any worse than having gambling boats. The traffic, one or two days a week will be rough (remember, those people park for days at a time) and parking will not be bad. That is what a parking garage is for. With the Wonderwood Expressway, most people will miss Mayport road. It's a shame that a GREAT opportunity will be lost.
blizz01
April 06, 2009, 07:17:26 PMJacksonville Business Journal
The Jacksonville Port Authority’s cruise terminal set a record last week when 2,623 passengers embarked on Carnival Cruise Lines’ Fascination cruise to Half Moon Cay and Nassau, Bahamas.
The previous record for a single cruise was 2,539 passengers, set earlier this year. The record-breaking cruise comes after the authority pulled back on its plans to build a $60 million terminal in Mayport Village to focus on its cargo business and see how the cruise industry weathers the recession.
....tsk-tsk.
BridgeTroll
April 06, 2009, 07:36:44 PMI wonder how many meals, do dads, and whatnots those folks may have bought if they were catching the boat in historic Mayport??
ChriswUfGator
April 06, 2009, 08:18:05 PMThat said, I agree that Kelo doesn't matter in this case....because JaxPort already has the land!
That's not really true. The whole premise of the Kelo-type cases was usually that the county or state wants to seize the land claiming an "economic" interest its redevelopment, rather than claiming a physical interest in needing to put a road in, etc. Another popular alternative was designating an area as "blighted" (even if it wasn't), just in order to set the stage for exercising ED.
Following 1567, this type of behavior (which is to say, the same fact pattern in Kelo) is now expressly prohibited in this state. My prior assessment is entirely accurate. 1567 largely gutted eminent domain powers in this state, by removing the most widely used options for exercising it. It didn't just clarify what was already there, it actually took away a significant chunk of eminent domain power.
reednavy
April 06, 2009, 09:38:45 PMOk, Jaxport already has the land, so the eminent domain issue goes right out the window, so to speak.
Build the damn thing, to me, Mayport was a village, now mostly wasted river frontage.
Harsh yes, but fairly true.
ChriswUfGator
April 06, 2009, 09:47:30 PMWell yeah, you're right about that. They've demolished a lot of it, just since I've been in town. There used to be commercial buildings and stores, now they're all gone. There also used to be a lot of active docks, with lots of commercial vessels, shrimp boats and such. They're all gone now, just rotting pilings. The only active docks left are the ones behind Singleton's. There were 2 or 3 Casino boats when I got here, much larger than the one that is there now (although the really big one was a real POS. It was a converted freighter and would break down and get stuck about every time it went out. Fun times). A couple tackle and bait shops, they're gone too.
I'm guessing the people who live there have to drive a ways to get anything they need. That part is sad.
But my only point with all this is, if everybody who actually lives there says they don't want it, then there are more than enough spots on the river where you could put it, without cramming it down peoples' throats. That's all. It just bothers me to see people who've lived in a place forever have their community so drastically changed over their own wishes. Just doesn't seem right.
mtraininjax
April 07, 2009, 01:06:01 AMChris - Ask the people of Yukon if they appreciated the Navy taking off and landing in front of their post office. Sign of the times also brings in revenue to the local area. Yukon is still there, smaller than before, but they weathered the storm. The shacks of Mayport will weather this storm as well, but all of Jax can prosper, just as we have with the Navy.
blizz01
June 18, 2009, 06:30:10 PM"there is not a chance we would loose the cruise industry." - Despite excellent numbers, this seems naive. This can't keep getting pushed back.............
Jacksonville Business Journal - by Mark Szakonyi
The Jacksonville Port Authority doesn’t expect to restart its push to build a new cruise terminal for at least another year.
Since the authority pulled back on its pursuit in March, the infrastructure bond market has improved and ships are being filled with passengers despite cruise opponents’ warning that the recession would cripple the industry. But authority board chairman William Mason said his priority is getting Hanjin Shipping Co. Ltd’s $208 million terminal online, which is expected to be open at the site of the current cruise terminal in 2012.
“I don’t think there is any chance we are going to lose the cruise industry,” said Mason.
The authority last week signed a two-year contract with Carnival Cruise Lines to keep service of its 2,052-passenger Fascination. Since October, the cruise ship has been running at nearly 113 percent capacity, said Tony Orsini, the authority’s senior director of cruise operations.
He said Carnival has reduced rates for the Jacksonville-based cruise but not by as much as it has cut cruise packages in other locations. The cruise industry as a whole has fared well in the recession, but Jacksonville’s cruise industry has the added plus of being a heavy drive-to market, meaning passengers don’t have to buy plane tickets. A third of the country is able to drive to Jacksonville in 24 hours or less.
Despite being a drive-to market, Jacksonville International Airport has experienced an increase in cruise-bound passengers, said Michael Stewart, Jacksonville Aviation Authority spokesman.
He said about 15 percent of the cruise-goers come through the airport and the majority come in on Saturday, which is a slow day for the business-passenger heavy airport. Jacksonville Port Authority Executive Director Rick Ferrin said the latest construction of a new cruise terminal could start is April 2012.
The cruise lines could be diverted to a temporary terminal while a new terminal is built and the existing cruise terminal could be kept open longer by making it the last structure to be demolished to make way for the Hanjin facility.
Although the authority’s call for design bids was recalled, the terminal was expected to include a 1,400-space, five-story parking garage and about 25,000 square feet of retail space. The construction would create about 1,500 jobs and have an annual $500 million impact on the area, said Louis Woods, a University of North Florida economics and geography professor, based on an economic analysis commissioned by the authority.
With 40 percent of passengers staying in Jacksonville before or after the cruise, hotels logged about 18,000 room-nights annually, Dan King, general manager of the Hyatt Regency Jacksonville Riverfront, said previously. Hotels reported a 6 percent to 7 percent occupancy drop when cruise service stopped between April and mid-September.
Each cruise passenger spends about $300 in the area, said Visit Jacksonville spokeswoman Lyndsay Rossman, and the Fascination has a $25 million impact on the area per call.
Jason
June 19, 2009, 03:11:56 PMI kind of agree. Lock down Hanjin and then push for the new terminal. The city has a proposal already. They just need to work with the locals to make it happen. IMO, Hanjin will benefit this economy FAR more than the cruise industry. Although, keeping both is even better!
blizz01
November 03, 2009, 07:53:20 AMThis was all over the news yesterday - look familiar?
Oasis of the Seas Under the Bridge of Storebaelt Denmark
http://www.metacafe.com/watch/3667427/oasis_of_the_seas_under_the_bridge_of_storebaelt_denmark/
Jason
November 03, 2009, 01:21:22 PMMan..... that ship is flipping HUGE!!!
Just think of what that puppy will look like parked at Port Everglades.
blizz01
November 03, 2009, 01:36:32 PMSeemed like the same scenario at the Dames Point (but on a smaller scale).
Jason
November 03, 2009, 02:35:29 PMIts amazing that they approached the bridge at full speed in order to keep the ship lower in the water. Man... the slightest miscalculation of less than a meter and WACK!!!!
Captain Zissou
November 03, 2009, 02:38:26 PMThat was probably the most tense moment in many of their lives. That would have been an Expensive miscalculation. Gotta love those engineers.
Dog Walker
November 03, 2009, 03:38:33 PMWhat's also incredible is that the bottom was more than sixty-five feet under the ship's bottom and the flipping thing is so HUGE that there was still bottom suction action. Just boggles the mind!
Jason
November 03, 2009, 04:25:34 PM^ That's what she said!?