Would you commute by train in Jacksonville?
Would you be interested in commuting to work on a train? The Jacksonville Transportation Authority is now conducting a study looking into the feasibility of having more commuter rail in the Jacksonville area. Is it a good idea to have commuter rail?
Where should the trains go? Tell Florida Times-Union reporter Larry Hannan what you think by calling him at (904) 359-4470 or e-mail him at larry.hannan@jacksonville.com.
Nashville's Music City Star $41 million / 32 mile commuter rail line opened in 2006. Will Jacksonville be receptive to a similar "no-frills" type of rail service?
As of Thursday, May 29th, 2008 at 12:00am over 91 responses had been posted online. With residents now forced to pay $4 dollars per gallon for gas, the overwhelming response has been yes!
Examples of typical positive responses:
"I would loop the train starting at the Airport, move it to the Regency Square Mall, to St Johns Town Center, to the Avenues Mall, then Downtown somewhere around the Bank of America Tower, and complete the loop at the airport. It makes a perfect loop, connects a lot of points of work and businesses. Add a few extra stops between the malls and a lot of people would use the system. I know I would." - David
"I would absolutely ride a train to the downtown area if I could board it somewhere between the Avenues Mall and the Julington Creek bridge … PROVIDED it ran early enough for me to get downtown." - Jim
"I would providing it ran early enough and it would have to go from Julington creek. Mandarin, Philips and University areas. It would need to go past the buiness that most of us work around to help any of us." - prmami
"Would I commute by train? In a heartbeat! I commute from St. Augustine to downtown. A commuter rail would be my heart’s desire, even if it took longer than my usual drive." - DoWhat
"I think rail is becoming a necessity, and I support the development of a commuter rail infrastructure wholeheartedly. Jacksonville is great, but it has long frustrated me with its lack of travel options.
We should allow for dense development to take place around the stations, as this will give us the most bang for the buck. Simply trying to retrofit a system upon Jacksonville’s existing sprawling development pattern without allowing the system to jumpstart and support its own development would be wasteful.
As for the route, I would suggest starting near the Orange Park mall, go across the Buckman, stop in Mandarin and the Baymeadows/Southside business district, and continue through downtown to the airport. A spur from Southside to the beaches would be useful." - Kirk
"Of course, it would be great to have a commuter rail here in Jacksonville. However, I think such system may only succeed if we have many stations and cover all main city areas. Otherwise, it would be a train to nowhere. I have seen a few failed projects like this around the country. If you’d have to drive 3-4 miles to the station, park your car, walk 5-10 minutes to the train, wait for a train, ride, wait for a bus or shuttle, and ride again — this wouldn’t work. It would take an hour and a half to get from Avenues Mall to Downtown. Nope, you need lots of rail so you could walk to the station. Guess what? Not gonna happen. I do not believe the city and county own enough land to build multiple loops. Plus, this is a colossal investment, I don’t think we can afford it now. The irony is that now is the perfect time to start building public transportation system: gas will only get more expensive and land is cheap now. Now, go explain this to the politicians. :-)" - Greg
"I would much rather ride light rail in to town than city bus transit. I believe the rail system is a must and we already have a good portion of the infrastructure in place. I would run veins from a central hub downtown to points like the airport north, the beaches east, st. augustine south, and orange park south west with stops along each line.I would be very much in favor of such a proposition." - Bassmouth
Of course, there are a few naysayers:
"Won’t work and it would be a colossal waste of taxpayer money, just the the so called “people mover.” I’ll fight it all the way." - William
"It wouldn’t work. Up north, they have sidewalks and crossing walks and all the shops and stores are crammed in small spaces. Here in Jacksonville, everything is so spread out. So let’s say I get off at a stop, it’s a pain in the butt to go anywhere because it’s hard to cross the streets and it’s hard for a lot of people to walk long distances. For instance, let’s say one of the stops is at the Avenues mall. But then I see Target and I want to go there. I don’t want to cross that five lane street to get to Target. On top of the fact that it’s about half a mile down. It’ll be easier to have my own car and go where I need to go" - Gabby
"We should all just stick to our hummers. Trains are for unamerican sissies." - Negative Nancy
"I would prefere to drill for oil through the heads of liberals and up the carabou’s rump! I am an American, not a friggin’ European. I want my car not a train!" - A Conservative
"My first thought is No, because it is inevitable that you would STILL be driving, to get to the train station….but then again, if it went from Orange Park to Baymeadows, it would probably still be worth it." - mels
"The City can’t even collect the garbage without raising our taxes.
I’m in favor of any type of transit program (preferrably a mixture, including real car and van pool programs), but I want to know how they plan to pay for it first and make sure it’s funded enough to be effective. The current plans for the BRT and the Jax Transportation Center are only funded for small piece of the entire project, if they don’t get the additional phases funded then what we end up with will be worse than what we have now.
I have zero faith in JTA being able to implement any type of transit system that will actually be functional. They are a road building agency that deals with transit because they have to, but they have very little in-house expertise on how to do it. They rely almost entirely on out of town consultants to tell them how to run their transit operations. As long as JTA is the driver on this project it will probably turn out to be a train wreck (pardon the pun)." - Getreal
Words of Wisdom
As JTA's hired rail consultants move forward on their commuter rail studies, here are a few tips from Metro Jacksonville that may help.
1. Confusion about Rail
In general, Jacksonvillians still appear to be confused about the differences between light rail and commuter rail. The study being currently conducted by JTA is for potential commuter rail lines. In short a "commuter rail" train can operate on existing railroad tracks, alongside freight rail cars. A "light rail" train will typically be electric and, by law, can not operate on the existing freight rail corridors in Jacksonville.
For Jacksonville, having the ability to use our vast network of existing rail corridors allows our region to implement commuter rail at a cheaper price then building light rail.
Charlotte's New LYNX Light Rail System
The American Public Transportation Association (APTA) in its Glossary of Transit Terminology defines light rail as: "An electric railway with a 'light volume' traffic capacity compared to heavy rail. Light rail may use shared or exclusive rights-of-way, high or low platform loading and multi-car trains or single cars."
However, some diesel powered transit calls itself light rail, such as the O-Train in Ottawa, Canada and River Line in New Jersey, United States, which use diesel multiple unit cars. In traditional transit terminology, these would be considered commuter rail lines.
San Diego's new Sprinter DMU line would be an example of diesel multiple unit commuter rail system that many confuse with traditional light rail.
Most commuter trains (Nashville Music City Star above) are built to heavy rail standards, differing from light rail or rapid transit systems by:
Being larger;
Having (in most cases) a lower frequency of service;
Having scheduled services (i.e. trains run at specific times rather than at specific intervals);
Serving lower-density areas, typically by connecting suburbs to the city centre;
Sharing track or right-of-way with intercity or freight trains
Their ability to coexist with freight or intercity services in the same right-of-way can drastically reduce system construction costs.
For Jacksonville, having the ability to use our vast network of existing rail corridors allows our region to implement commuter rail at a cheaper price then building light rail.
2. Keep it Simple
While we would all like a rail system to immediately take us anywhere we want to go, it is unrealistic to expect that the community can cover the expense. Instead of trying to swim across the Atlantic, lets conquer the swimming pool first.
In other words, it is unfeasible to immediately purchase right-of-way and lay track to the beaches. Instead, follow the step of successful peer cities by moving forward with a decent affordable starter line. This method allows visual progress to take place quickly and makes it easier to secure funding for additional lines.
Using the 2002 Winter Olympics as a catalyst for introducing light rail in the region, Salt Lake City officials moved forward with 15 mile starter light rail line in 1999.
Today, only nine years later, Salt Lake City's mass transit system operates two light rail lines and a commuter rail line (above) running on 63 miles of track. As of July 2006, metropolitan Jacksonville had 210,275 more residents than metropolitan Salt Lake City. Despite being smaller, Salt Lake City has become a model community that kept things simple by starting small and expanding with time.
3. Take Advantage of Opportunities
When opportunity knocks, we have to take advantage and answer the door. In the past few years, with projects like the farmer's market, Florida Coastal School of Law, the Landing expansion and FSU Medical School, we've found a way to take advantage of significant opportunities. Today, several factors are creating an opportunity for bringing rail transit back to Jacksonville.
For example, gas prices continue to climb, the Orlando commuter rail and CSX/JaxPort deals create additional rail capacity locally, and we have $100 million set aside in Better Jacksonville Plan funds for purchase of rapid transit right of way.
The 7.5 mile long Houston Metrorail light rail system was fully financed locally, after failing to receive help from the State of Texas and the FTA. Today, the city is preparing to move forward with a massive expansion of this successful rail system, despite the FTA's desire for bus rapid transitways.
Traditionally, we would have had to rely on the FTA for funding and navigate years of expensive red tape to be rejected the funding to help establish a system locally. With the stars aligning, it may be time for Jacksonville to chart a new path and follow those taken by Austin, Houston, and now Detroit. This is the path of opening the door of opportunity, even if the FTA isn't on board.
Article by Ennis Davis
hillary supporter
June 03, 2008, 09:47:12 AMcontinue development of urban core skyway. isnt work to be continued on skyway towards brooklyn this fall. a huge majority of jacksonville has no problem with mass transit. im not saying they advocate it, they just dont have problems with it. as in the article, some will be actively against it. this is where the city needs to make that unpopular decision. and us advocates have to be vocal.
stephendare
June 03, 2008, 11:48:57 AMSo Lake, how do we publicly express this sentiment?
Tom, your in Austin.. dont they have a rail there or something?
stephendare
June 03, 2008, 12:01:41 PMI wonder if metrojacksonville would print bumper stickers? That would be ironic, wouldnt it?
"If I had my choice, Id be using commuter rail!" on the backs of thousands of car windows?
thelakelander
June 03, 2008, 12:12:07 PMBy continuing to do what we're doing:
A. Keep the local media's attention on the story. If you hit them over the head with the facts over and over again, they'll get the message. This method put a halt to the Downtown BRT transit mall plan, revised the parking ordinance and almost got us smart meters downtown.
B. Keep meeting with JTA. Being oppositional at times has its benefits, but so does meeting behind closed doors.
see this thread for more info on what Austin is doing: http://www.metrojacksonville.com/content/view/589/116/
stephendare
June 03, 2008, 12:17:58 PMI wonder if there are public relations campaigns in Austin about their rail that are citizen based?
And dude, what do you think about bumper stickers?
thelakelander
June 03, 2008, 12:22:28 PMI wouldn't put any on my vehicles. Its nothing against the cause, I just like my automobiles clean and clear.
As for Austin:
Austin Commuter
http://austincommuter.com/index2.html
Austin Citizen's for Personal Rapid Transit
http://www.acprt.org/DocumentOfTheDay.cfm?Item=DOD031019
BicycleAustin.Info
http://bicycleaustin.info/rail/
stephendare
June 03, 2008, 12:31:52 PMAs for Austin:
Austin Commuter
http://austincommuter.com/index2.html
Austin Citizen's for Personal Rapid Transit
http://www.acprt.org/DocumentOfTheDay.cfm?Item=DOD031019
BicycleAustin.Info
http://bicycleaustin.info/rail/
Tom, is there much public sentiment that you can see in Austin on a direct level?
I really like this bumper sticker idea.
Im calling a little shop right now to get prices.
stephendare
June 03, 2008, 12:48:23 PMstephendare
June 03, 2008, 12:49:27 PMany other suggestions?
Seraphs
June 03, 2008, 12:50:44 PM"If I had my choice, Id be using commuter rail!" on the backs of thousands of car windows?
Almost never would you find a bumper sticker on my vehicle, I agree with Lake. However, Stephendare, I think it's an excellent idea and if the bumper sticker was done in good taste I would apply one. For instance a little 'square deal' sticker that could be applied to the back window.
Imagine motorist stuck in traffic with nothing to gaze at but your commuter rail sticker.
stephendare
June 03, 2008, 12:59:47 PMOcklawaha
June 03, 2008, 01:24:57 PMOcklawaha
Lost on DART somewhere between Plano and
Sage Brush Wells Tx... Looking out for those "indians"
stephendare
June 03, 2008, 01:48:30 PMwow. ock. hilarious. but what a way to take it 'there'.
lol.
any other ideas?
gatorback
June 03, 2008, 01:52:36 PMTom, your in Austin.. dont they have a rail there or something?
Yes Stephen in a big way. The people of Austin have voted for and approved a long-range transit plan.
Capital MetroRail is on track for service to begin on the Red Line in the fall of 2008. Sleek, new trains will take you to work in comfort and style, providing you with high-back seats, bicycle and overhead racks, and Wi-Fi connections. Some seating areas will feature tray tables. Capital MetroRail’s initial service will be during morning and afternoon peak hours. Regular and special shuttle buses will whisk you to your final destination.
The Red Line will run on 32-miles of existing freight tracks between Leander and Downtown Austin. It will provide convenient service for suburban and central Austin residents. Future connections are being studied along existing Capital Metro freight tracks from Downtown to Manor and beyond. Future extensions along TxDOT’s abandoned MoKan corridor are also possible.
stephendare
June 03, 2008, 01:53:56 PMso is it about getting it on a city referendum?
Ocklawaha
June 03, 2008, 01:55:40 PMUh... Fella's, lets leave them confused about light rail-vs-commuter rail
I really believe it is JTA and Metro-Jacksonville that is confused here...
ANY rail that carries commuters is in FACT a form of COMMUTER RAIL.
So Light Rail, Streetcars, Trams, Horse Cars, Cable Cars, Locomotive Hauled
Commuter trains, DMU units, RDC cars... The whole batch is really commuter
rail.
The problem comes from our "common use" of Commuter Rail to describe only
big, locomotive hauled commuter trains or giant DMU units that are allowed to
run on the mainline railroads with freight traffic.
The problem gets even worse with the statement that light rail can't run on regular
railroad tracks "BY LAW". This is not a fact. New Jerseys River Line does it all day
long with tiny streetcar like DMU units. New changes have allowed NS to switch
industry while the line is still being worked by Light Rail. Granted great steps in both
signals (available off the shelf) and interlocks are involved to keep the two modes
apart, it none-the-less works. Ditto in San Diego and their San Diego Trolley which
track shares with the old San Diego and Arizona Eastern Railroad.
BOTTOM LINE:
We could build light-rail on any track that the railroad wants to leave. Further, we could
build Light-Rail on any track in which the railroad can back off of during the day and leave the
freights as a midnight to 5 am window. That CSX "A" line comes to mind for this as the trains
may be shifted over to the "S" down the center of the state. What service is left is Palatka
Coal and Pulp Wood/Paper, these could easily run at night leaving the electrics up for the day.
Ditto any city owned lines such as the old "S" downtown. Even a second or third track alongside
FEC (which might be needed for ANY rail) could be electric and run LRT trains.
Electric with green generation is the wave of the near future. These DART trains are so quiet I'm
not even sure you could pick up the sounds with my video camera. More like a high speed hum
with classic Interurban "nasal Wooooooo Horns" and electric bells. The O&M costs for electric rail
is way less then for other modes, including BRT. Going green with say, methaine generators at an
old land fill or wind units on the Jetties... and we could RIDE the WIND in Jacksonville, Or the SUN
or as usual, we'd ride the garbage... (Can't think of a catchy green phrase for that one!).
Well, the gates are going down and there's a bright yellow and white car in sight.... Hasta la Vista
Ya'll... Next stop?
"Daddy can I just ride forever?"
Ocklawaha
gatorback
June 03, 2008, 02:33:36 PMIn Texas it was. I think what's cool is how supportive the voters were.
thelakelander
June 03, 2008, 03:04:50 PMI really believe it is JTA and Metro-Jacksonville that is confused here...
ANY rail that carries commuters is in FACT a form of COMMUTER RAIL.
So Light Rail, Streetcars, Trams, Horse Cars, Cable Cars, Locomotive Hauled
Commuter trains, DMU units, RDC cars... The whole batch is really commuter
rail.
In terms of "commuting" people you're right. However, the real issue is confusing light rail with diesel operated "commuter" rail. What JTA is studying would be something along the lines of the Nashville Music Star, Orlando commuter rail proposal or Miami's Tri-Rail. None of these systems are "light rail" and to make the claim only confuses people.
big, locomotive hauled commuter trains or giant DMU units that are allowed to
run on the mainline railroads with freight traffic.
The problem gets even worse with the statement that light rail can't run on regular
railroad tracks "BY LAW". This is not a fact. New Jerseys River Line does it all day
long with tiny streetcar like DMU units. New changes have allowed NS to switch
industry while the line is still being worked by Light Rail.
New Jersey's RiverLine does not operate with electric catenary. However, I assume you're classifying it as light rail because of the weight of the vehicles? Considering Amtrak will still use the CSX "A" Line and potentially expand to the FEC, a New Jersey RiverLine DMU system would probably be a stretch for anything outside of the S-Line heading North from Downtown to the Airport.
BOTTOM LINE:
We could build light-rail on any track that the railroad wants to leave. Further, we could
build Light-Rail on any track in which the railroad can back off of during the day and leave the
freights as a midnight to 5 am window. That CSX "A" line comes to mind for this as the trains
may be shifted over to the "S" down the center of the state. What service is left is Palatka
Coal and Pulp Wood/Paper, these could easily run at night leaving the electrics up for the day.
Ditto any city owned lines such as the old "S" downtown. Even a second or third track alongside
FEC (which might be needed for ANY rail) could be electric and run LRT trains.
Sounds expensive, especially if we can avoid making costly investments initially. Remember the term "keep it simple". We'll most likely need to get our feet wet first with an affordable efficient starter line if we want anything done within the next five to ten years. If we can get away initially without having to raise taxes, lay miles of parallel track on certain corridors or rely on FTA funding and approval for a starter line, we should make every effort to do so.
Ocklawaha
June 03, 2008, 03:07:36 PMThis would be a great way to attack it, but I'd FORCE it to fast-track since BJP money is in the bank...
Make them start turning dirt on Skyway improvements the week after the vote, then phase in the rail
and LRT/Streetcar within 24 months... Salt Lake City, Houston and others have done it. Hell, museum groups have put up 1-10 miles of streetcar with all volunteer labor and donations, old stuff, junk, wire and wooden poles within a couple of years. Why can't we go this just a bit better and still keep the streetcar portion within a "museum budget" and time frame?
Are we really this dumb? Someone posted on here they hated TURTLES... Ya know, I kind of agree... Say this is easy, using the sons laptop on a LRT. No smells, no rocking, no click-clack just a hummmmmmmmmmm...
Ocklawaha
stephendare
June 03, 2008, 05:19:57 PMI wonder how to get a city wide referendum started?
Driven1
June 03, 2008, 05:24:29 PMHow to get it started?
Get the local business community behind it and then get it publicized. This is what those who wanted to bring the Navy back to Cecil Field did. They also requested and received time before the City Council to introduce their measure. They followed that with a well-attended news conference.
Basically, it boils down to getting the folks that count caring. And then, publicity.
That's it in a nutshell.
gatorback
June 03, 2008, 06:07:55 PMCapital Metro was approved in 1985 by the citizens of Austin with a one-cent sales tax. In 1986, the system was launched, taking over the existing city of Austin bus services.
In 1989, public perception was that too many buses were running virtually empty. The MTA tax was cut to 3/4 percent, and Capital Metro attempted to boost ridership by eliminating fares entirely. Although the program was wildly successful in attracting new riders, a perception created by a few in the media was that there were too many "problem riders" using the system. This shallow, baseless idea caught on to some professional hacks looking to write papers on the period.[2] [3] Both of these footnoted references point exclusively to testimony by a former Capital Metro board member turned staffer, Lyndon Henry, whose assertions that ridership only increased by 10 percent of regular fixed-route riders, that operating expenses skyrocketed, and that vagrants drove away normal riders contradict documents from the period.[4]
Market research showed that "In only a couple of isolated instances are on-board safety or less than desirable passengers or anything else negatively attributed to the free fare program cited as reasons for discontinued use of bus service."[5] Despite the facts and widespread support -- general public approval of the fare-free program was 81%, even though 49% of respondents had never used Capital Metro services; among riders, it was 97% -- the political forces fearing the media farces reinstated fares in January 1991.
In response to the new ADA compliance rules passed in 1990, the system eventually became the first bus transit agency to have its entire bus fleet equipped with wheelchair ramps.
In 1993, it took over shuttle bus service for the University of Texas campus and expanded it to run to nearby apartment complexes off-campus that cater to university students. (By 2004, Capital Metro was collecting $5.2 million a year from student fees.[6]
In October 1995, Capital Metro's board of directors increased the MTA sales tax back to its original rate of one percent, promising to set aside the additional quarter percent for future projects. This brought the annual tax burden up to $349 per household.
In 1997, Capital Metro's board of directors was "reorganized" just ahead of a performance review by the Texas Comptroller.[7] The review cited "ongoing criminal investigation" by the FBI, "irresponsible management", "expensive, embarrassing mistakes", "dubious contracting and purchasing practices", $118,000 spent on "food, parties, and presents for its employees" and culminated with "We have never, in all of the performance reviews we have conducted, seen an agency with such a lack of accountability."[8]
In 2000, Capital Metro proposed spending $1.9 billion for a light rail system with 52 miles of track on existing streets. The referendum was narrowly defeated at the polls.[9]
In 2004, Capital Metro added a trip planner to its web site. Riders enter their intended origin and destination, along with optional time, date, and other information, and the trip planner displays itineraries showing the stops, departure and arrival times, and times to get from the origin to the destination.
In 2004, after four years of additional lobbying by Capital Metro, a commuter rail plan — to be built on pre-existing freight rail lines — won voter approval. Capital MetroRail's new rail line will run from Leander through northwest Austin and east Austin before terminating at a station on the southeastern edge of downtown Austin, at the location of the Austin Convention Center. It is scheduled for completion in 2008.
In September 2005 Stadler Rail won a bid to build six diesel-electric rail cars for the system.[10] Those six cars will carry up to 1000 commuters per trip, on five routes in the morning, five in the evening, with a handful of routes running during the midday. The initial cost for this rail line is $90 million dollars
Charles Hunter
June 03, 2008, 11:13:46 PMI think the BJP Transit money is limited to purchasing right-of-way, not rolling stock or track. I also seem to recall (and I think thelakelander confirmed), that the BJP referendum prohibited the use of BJP funds on the Skyway.
Saw an article recently (Sunday paper?) that freight rail traffic is expected to double in the next 10[?] years, requiring current single tracks to be doubled, or tripled. Might be smart for a rail company to partner with a local government to lay tracks for commuters by day, and freight by night. Although the article also said that freight companies wanted access to times of day now reserved for commuters in some cities.
Coolyfett
June 04, 2008, 03:09:16 AMlol.
any other ideas?
Yea... How about a sticker with a red background with white letters that say "Driving!! Trains are Better!!" And just slap em on stop signs, right under "STOP" Those would get noticed.
Coolyfett
June 04, 2008, 03:16:58 AMMake them start turning dirt on Skyway improvements the week after the vote, then phase in the rail
and LRT/Streetcar within 24 months...
Ocklawaha
What sort of improvements Ock? How much could the BJP money do??
thelakelander
June 04, 2008, 06:58:58 AMUnless something changes, the remaining BJP money can only be used for right-of-way purchase. Unless that right-of-way purchase included buying or leasing "existing" track, other sources would have to found to fund the construction of the actual system and cover O&M expenses for the first couple of years.
Ocklawaha
June 04, 2008, 10:53:25 AMYes, I know all about the BJP money restrictions, but those who make the rules can change the rules...
NEAR EASTSIDE of DOWNTOWN:
If this is to become the hub of all future major venues, a large hotel, maybe a convention center, Hogans Creek Walk or Park, Negro League Hall of Fame or what ever else one could think of then it could use CHOICE to sell transportation. There is a new law that will prevent JTA from providing shuttles on game days or special venues IF a private operator wants to give it a go. So buses might be out of the picture. The same would NOT apply to Skyway or Streetcars.
Take the SKYWAY down Bay to Randolph to the garage at Randolph and Duval.
Take a new streetcar down Water-Independence to Newnan - Beaver to Randolph and Duval.
The Streetcar can then expand north via Main Street (local line)
It can expand to Gateway Mall as (Express Line) via the old F&J or Maxwell House branch.
Some distant day either or both could cross a new Matthews bridge or tunnel. Take you pick - Arlington, Beaches - JU - Town Center? Then what do you do with a Skyway? Well give it one or two, or better yet send it up the line along Talleyrand (the port is booming ya know...)
Regular commuter rail pretty much holds to the former ACL to Green Cove Springs
Current FEC to St. Augustine
Current City "S" and CSX north to Yulee
Amazing the lack of vision of these JTA planners.
Ocklawaha
Ocklawaha
June 04, 2008, 11:23:27 AMSorry for the distraction from the above, but the other "MUSTS" for the Skyway to move ahead are:
Get it up and OVER I-95 past the hotel, and OVER the FEC in San Marco to terminate at Atlantic and the FEC where a multi-modal station could be built. As the I-95 Southbank interchanges get ready to undergo yet another-another-another complete rebuilding, ADD A RAMP TO AND FROM ATLANTIC and build the damned parking garage somewhere next to the multi-modal station. This way commuters from Beach-Atlantic-I-95 could just exit and park-n-ride. As it is now, you drive almost downtown, then backtrack to a garage, then walk a block to a skyway, that takes you back where you just turned!
A San Marco Streetcar needs to focus on the "Square" and on the historic Hendrix - San Jose - San Marco areas.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Riverside: Again, a split, streetcars down Park to focus on the historic core and tie St. Vincents, Park and King, MAYBE ANNIE LYTLE, and Union Station to downtown.
Skyway, down Riverside (which never was a Trolley route past Forrest) all the way to I-95/Blue Cross/ and MAYBE ANNIE LYTLE.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Talking with one of my contractor friends, he suggested a solution to the JTA "We can't go near Amtrak at Union Station" argument. Not only do they do railroad bridges, and he priced one for me at under 1 Million on the Northside... He took a look at the TUNNELS and said, you know we could re-open these and bore on under the concourse and BAY STREET to come up at the Skyway.
Now Imagine that Skyway station rebuilt to match the older 1880 style depot ruins across the street. A long inclined Moving Sidewalk (not esclator) rise from below ground to the Skyway while another rises from Street Level. Amazing. A short walk and right under the station to wisk yourself up and out. Even a councourse into the Depot itself and another for Streetcars and Buses.
Remember the new law might make BRT an even WORSE expense.,
Ocklawaha
thelakelander
June 04, 2008, 01:30:30 PMNEAR EASTSIDE of DOWNTOWN:
If this is to become the hub of all future major venues, a large hotel, maybe a convention center, Hogans Creek Walk or Park, Negro League Hall of Fame or what ever else one could think of then it could use CHOICE to sell transportation. There is a new law that will prevent JTA from providing shuttles on game days or special venues IF a private operator wants to give it a go. So buses might be out of the picture. The same would NOT apply to Skyway or Streetcars.
Take the SKYWAY down Bay to Randolph to the garage at Randolph and Duval.
Take a new streetcar down Water-Independence to Newnan - Beaver to Randolph and Duval.
The Streetcar can then expand north via Main Street (local line)
It can expand to Gateway Mall as (Express Line) via the old F&J or Maxwell House branch.
Some distant day either or both could cross a new Matthews bridge or tunnel. Take you pick - Arlington, Beaches - JU - Town Center? Then what do you do with a Skyway? Well give it one or two, or better yet send it up the line along Talleyrand (the port is booming ya know...)
Regular commuter rail pretty much holds to the former ACL to Green Cove Springs
Current FEC to St. Augustine
Current City "S" and CSX north to Yulee
Amazing the lack of vision of these JTA planners.
Ocklawaha
How many miles of rail are you talking about and what would be the general cost/square mile to implement such a plan? Do you think it would be possible to achieve without having to raise taxes?
Ocklawaha
June 04, 2008, 06:40:19 PMBetween 8 and 14 miles, depending on which "extras" we added to the core loop. The core COULD BE built as one way for starters then go to double track as the streetscape changes downtown. In fact, with change of parking, we could also go with single track with passing sidings and safety island (stations) throughout with the creation of a center median on the loop or extensions. In other words lots of ways to economize.
I would suggest the whole thing come from BJP funds to FAST TRACK the system. Then go after FTA-JTA-GRANTS for future extras. As for operations check out the possible use of a special transit tax or development tax district in the areas where land owners will experience 100's of % increase in values. That would take care of O&M in case the FTA or CITY wasn't otherwise available.
CHECK OUT: http://jacksonvilletransit.blogspot.com/
"Jacksonville Answers Kansas City"
Ocklawaha
thelakelander
June 04, 2008, 09:36:53 PMGreat blog site you have there.
fsujax
June 05, 2008, 08:04:41 AMI like the site.
Coolyfett
June 09, 2008, 02:36:43 AMGet it up and OVER I-95 past the hotel, and OVER the FEC in San Marco to terminate at Atlantic and the FEC where a multi-modal station could be built. As the I-95 Southbank interchanges get ready to undergo yet another-another-another complete rebuilding, ADD A RAMP TO AND FROM ATLANTIC and build the damned parking garage somewhere next to the multi-modal station. This way commuters from Beach-Atlantic-I-95 could just exit and park-n-ride.
Ocklawaha
What Hotel?? And isn't the Jax Transportation Center a Multi-Modul station?? Would Jax build 2 of those building/systems? Excuse me Ock i'm a lil confused. Is there a difference between a Multi-Modul station and a Transportation center?